The labour market consequences of extended waiting times for elective inpatient healthcare: an observational study in England using national data
Ayoubkhani, D.; Aston, H. E.; Bunk, H.; Henstock, T.; Madhukar, A.; Batrakova, S.; Memon, A.; Nafilyan, V.
Show abstract
BackgroundWaiting times for elective healthcare in England have increased since 2015/16, when the constitutional standard was last met. However, little is known about the economic consequences of extended waits. We estimated the labour market shortfall induced by above-target waiting times for elective hospital admissions in England over a nine-year period. MethodsCohorts of patients aged 30 to <59 years were identified for 32 treatment specialties using non-emergency inpatient records from NHS hospitals spanning April 2015 to March 2024. Patients were excluded if they had a record within the same treatment specialty from April 2009 to March 2015. Target waiting times were estimated from an exponential distribution with a rate parameter estimated from admissions in 2015/16, assuming patients admitted in each year of the study period remained at their observed percentile of the distribution in that year. Using published trajectories of age-standardised employee pay following elective inpatient treatment, we calculated the additional volume of employment and value of earnings that would be accrued up to five years after the decision to admit, had waiting times remained at target levels. ResultsThe study population comprised 5.4 million patients (mean age 47.0 years, 54.3% female), of whom 27.3% were treated in multiple specialties during the study period. The biggest decreases in the maximum wait when moving from observed to target waiting times were seen in clinical haematology (13.6 months), medical oncology (12.5 months) and clinical oncology (10.1 months). Losses to earnings due to above-target waiting times were greatest for trauma and orthopaedics services ({pound}375 million over five years), general surgery ({pound}368 million) and urology ({pound}229 million). Losses to employment were largest for trauma and orthopaedics (9,228 person-years of employment over five years), general surgery (5,570 person-years) and pain management (2,631 person-years). Across all 32 analysed treatment specialties, the total five-year loss was estimated at {pound}1.5-2.3 billion for earnings and 20,502-33,130 person-years for employment. ConclusionsExtended waiting times for elective inpatient treatment in England are likely to have impacted the labour market. At the macroeconomic level, reducing waits may lead to increased earnings and economic growth, higher tax receipts and reduced welfare expenditure.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying markers of health-seeking behaviour and healthcare access in UK electronic health records 94%
- Inequalities in healthcare disruptions during the Covid-19 pandemic: Evidence from 12 UK population-based longitudinal studies 94%
- Trends in inequalities in avoidable hospitalisations across the COVID-19 pandemic: A cohort study of 23.5 million people in England 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health impacts of takeaway management zones around schools in six different local authorities across England: a public health modelling study using PRIMEtime 93%
- Parental Income Gradients in Adult Health: A National Cohort Study 91%
- Maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index and risk of preterm birth: a collaboration using large routine health datasets 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Progressivity of out-of-pocket costs under Australia’s universal health care system: a national linked data study 92%
- Drug company methodologies used for reporting in the UK pharmaceutical industry payment transparency database between 2015-2019: A content analysis 89%
- Do Faster-Trained Physicians Fill the Gaps? Geographic Concentration of Emergency Medicine physicians with different postgraduate training in Ontario Canada 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Overall and cause-specific hospitalisation and death after COVID-19 hospitalisation in England: cohort study in OpenSAFELY using linked primary care, secondary care and death registration data 93%
- Rapid Epidemiological Analysis of Comorbidities and Treatments as risk factors for COVID-19 in Scotland (REACT-SCOT): a population-based case-control study 92%
- Factors associated with excess all-cause mortality in the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a time-series analysis using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Healthcare presentations with self-harm and the association with COVID-19: an e-cohort whole-population-based study using individual-level linked routine electronic health records in Wales, UK, 2016 - March 2021 93%
- A model framework for projecting the prevalence and impact of Long-COVID in the UK 93%
- Health and Economic Costs of Early, Delayed and No Suppression of COVID-19: The Case of Australia 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.