Back

Strong Public Disapproval of Proposed Reductions in Psychologist Competency Standards in Ontario: Findings from 1,141 General Community Adults in an Observational Cohort Study

MacKillop, J.; MacKillop, E.; Belisario, K.; Goosens, I.; Syan, S. K.; Bird, B.; Rice, D.; Hatchard, T.; Levitt, E.

2025-11-25 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.11.21.25340610 medRxiv
Show abstract

The regulatory body for psychologists in Ontario, the College of Psychologists and Behavior Analysts of Ontario, has proposed sweeping reductions in competency requirements. These include elimination of the doctoral degree requirement, dramatic reductions in clinical training, and elimination of specializations and would make Ontario the largest jurisdiction with the lowest competency standards in North America. There has been considerable public opposition from active practitioners, but public attitudes toward these changes are unknown. The current study assessed attitudes in 1,141 general community adults in Ontario (mean age = 42.7, 62.1% female) in an ongoing longitudinal observational cohort study. The large majority disapproved of the proposed changes (71%), whereas 20% reported no opinion and 9% approved of the changes. The modal response was strong disapproval (44%), which was more than half of those who disapproved, whereas among those who approved, only a small proportion expressed strong approval (2%). In order of frequency, reasons for disapproval were reduced quality of healthcare (94%), more healthcare providers with a lower skillset and competencies (85%), higher probability of misdiagnosis (78%), and increased risk in high-stakes contexts (69%), increased likelihood of conflicting medical opinions (55%), and adverse impacts on the current workforce and trainees (both 54%). When asked about the single most important concern, 62% identified reduced quality of healthcare followed by an increased number of healthcare providers with lower professional competency (22%). Responses to open text options were highly consistent with the quantitative results (e.g., "We dont need fewer professional standards--we need highly skilled professionals to deal with an increasingly complex world."). Collectively, the results suggest strong disapproval for the proposed reductions in psychologist competency standards among general community adults in Ontario. VISUAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=71 SRC="FIGDIR/small/25340610v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (19K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@cdba53org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@83de21org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16c75edorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1b2380e_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG Simplified Distribution of Public Attitudes toward Psychologist Competency Reductions (n=1,141) C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.6%
3
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.3%
4
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
7
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
8
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
9
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
10
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
13
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
18
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
19
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
21
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
27
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
29
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%