Strong Public Disapproval of Proposed Reductions in Psychologist Competency Standards in Ontario: Findings from 1,141 General Community Adults in an Observational Cohort Study
MacKillop, J.; MacKillop, E.; Belisario, K.; Goosens, I.; Syan, S. K.; Bird, B.; Rice, D.; Hatchard, T.; Levitt, E.
Show abstract
The regulatory body for psychologists in Ontario, the College of Psychologists and Behavior Analysts of Ontario, has proposed sweeping reductions in competency requirements. These include elimination of the doctoral degree requirement, dramatic reductions in clinical training, and elimination of specializations and would make Ontario the largest jurisdiction with the lowest competency standards in North America. There has been considerable public opposition from active practitioners, but public attitudes toward these changes are unknown. The current study assessed attitudes in 1,141 general community adults in Ontario (mean age = 42.7, 62.1% female) in an ongoing longitudinal observational cohort study. The large majority disapproved of the proposed changes (71%), whereas 20% reported no opinion and 9% approved of the changes. The modal response was strong disapproval (44%), which was more than half of those who disapproved, whereas among those who approved, only a small proportion expressed strong approval (2%). In order of frequency, reasons for disapproval were reduced quality of healthcare (94%), more healthcare providers with a lower skillset and competencies (85%), higher probability of misdiagnosis (78%), and increased risk in high-stakes contexts (69%), increased likelihood of conflicting medical opinions (55%), and adverse impacts on the current workforce and trainees (both 54%). When asked about the single most important concern, 62% identified reduced quality of healthcare followed by an increased number of healthcare providers with lower professional competency (22%). Responses to open text options were highly consistent with the quantitative results (e.g., "We dont need fewer professional standards--we need highly skilled professionals to deal with an increasingly complex world."). Collectively, the results suggest strong disapproval for the proposed reductions in psychologist competency standards among general community adults in Ontario. VISUAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=71 SRC="FIGDIR/small/25340610v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (19K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@cdba53org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@83de21org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16c75edorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1b2380e_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG Simplified Distribution of Public Attitudes toward Psychologist Competency Reductions (n=1,141) C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Benefits and Harms of Open Notes in Mental Health: A Delphi Survey of International Experts 93%
- Investigating experiences of stigma and its impact on substance use recovery among residents of recovery residences in the United States: A scoping review protocol. BSGH 020 93%
- Clinician perspectives on what constitutes good practice in community services for people with Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic meta-synthesis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementing an Advance Choice Documents resource for Black African and Caribbean people with experience of compulsory psychiatric admission 93%
- A qualitative meta-synthesis of service users’ and carers’ experiences of assessment and involuntary hospital admissions under mental health legislations: a five-year update 93%
- A scoping review of trauma informed approaches in acute, crisis, emergency and residential mental health care 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Applications of Large Language Models in Psychiatry: A Systematic Review 92%
- Development of Goal Management Training + (GMT + ) for Methamphetamine Use Disorder Through Collaborative Design: A Process Description 92%
- Business as Un-usual: Access to mental health and primary care services for people with severe mental illness during the COVID-19 restrictions 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.