Back

From Normal Variation in Sleep to Clinical Sleep Disorders: Genetic Insights from Over One Million Individuals

Kunorozva, L.; Valliere, J.; Chen, C.-Y.; Maher, M.; Tchio, C.; Burns, A.; Zhang, Y.; Strausz, S.; FinnGen, ; Estonian Biobank Team, ; Winkelman, J.; Gottlieb, D. J.; Ge, T.; Wood, A. R.; Weedon, M. N.; Jones, S. E.; Redline, S.; Abner, E.; Saxena, R.; Ollila, H. M.; Lane, J. M.

2025-11-22 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2025.11.21.25340447 medRxiv
Show abstract

Sleep disorders affect over 30% of the U.S population and are linked to increased disease risk and mortality. However, the genetic architecture of sleep disorders and the overlap of sleep disorders with habitual sleep quality, quantity, and timing have been poorly characterized. In addition, it is unknown if clinical sleep disorders are extremes of habitual sleep traits. Here, we systematically investigated the genetic basis of seven clinical sleep disorder traits, and sixteen medications used for sleep problems in 1,600,000 individuals. We identified 590 genetic associations for sleep apnea, insomnia, restless legs syndrome, narcolepsy and a combined sleep disorder phenotype, of which 367 were previously unreported. Additionally, we discovered 142 genetic associations with sleep medication use. While overall genetic architecture was shared across sleep traits, we found unique genetic factors for the different sleep disorders that reflect fundamentally different biological mechanisms including for example autoimmune processes with narcolepsy and skeletal morphology in sleep apnea. Furthermore, sleep genetic factors showed a broad multi-omic impact on gene and protein expression levels. These findings suggest that while clinical sleep disorders share genetic architecture with each other and with variation in sleep patterns within the general population, they are not simply extremes of normal sleep variation but involve unique biological mechanisms. These results advance our understanding of sleep disorders and suggest potential novel therapeutic targets.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Sleep
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
45.4%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
3
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.4%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 17%
3.2%
5
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.6%
6
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.4%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
8
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
9
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
10
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
11
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
12
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
60 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
13
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.1%
14
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
15
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
Sleep Advances
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
17
Neuropsychopharmacology
153 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
19
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
20
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
Sleep Medicine
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
22
Genetics in Medicine
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.6%