Reassessing the First Year of COVID-19: Estimating Infections and Tracking Pandemic Trends with Probabilistic Bias Analysis
Harkare, H. V.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe novel SARS-CoV-2 virus, first identified in China in December 2019, rapidly spread worldwide, resulting in 114 million confirmed cases and 2.5 million reported deaths by February 28, 2021. Yet considerable uncertainty persists regarding the true scale of infections, as limited testing capacity and inconsistent surveillance substantially hindered accurate case detection. Robust estimates of infection burden are essential for understanding the pandemics full impact and guiding effective public health responses. MethodsThis study aimed to quantify the health burden of COVID-19 in India, Mexico, the United Kingdom, and the United States. A probabilistic bias analysis model is used to estimate the true number of SARS-CoV-2 infections, accounting for factors such as repeated testing, infection waves, and viral mutations to provide a more accurate assessment of the pandemics true scale in each country. ResultsBy February 28, 2021, the estimated total COVID-19 infections across India, Mexico, the United Kingdom, and the United States reached 286.7 million - more than six times the reported cases. India had the highest estimated infections (129.3 million), followed by the United States (98.6 million), Mexico (44.9 million), and the United Kingdom (14 million). Detection rates varied significantly, with Mexico underreporting infections by a factor of 22, while the United Kingdom and the United States had the highest detection rates. Testing capacity played a key role, with high-income countries conducting over four times more tests per 1,000 people than lower-income nations. ConclusionThis study demonstrating substantial underreporting of SARS-CoV-2 during the pre-vaccination period. These retrospective estimates provide a more accurate historical baseline for interpreting pandemic dynamics and remain valuable for assessing long-term health impacts and improving preparedness for future epidemics.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the undetected infections in the Covid-19 outbreak by harnessing capture-recapture methods 94%
- Evaluating COVID-19 reporting data in the context of testing strategies across 31 LMICs 94%
- The burden of active infection and anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in the general population: Results from a statewide survey in Karnataka, India 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Projecting the impact of SARS-CoV-2 variants on the COVID-19 epidemic and social restoration in the United States: a mathematical modelling study 94%
- Tracking changes in reporting of epidemiological data during the COVID-19 pandemic in Southeast Asia: an observational study during the first wave 93%
- Social contacts and transmission of COVID-19 in British Columbia, Canada 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel application of capture-recapture methods to estimate the completeness of contact tracing during a large outbreak of Ebola Virus Disease, Democratic Republic of Congo, 2018-2020 93%
- SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in Chattogram, Bangladesh before the Delta surge, March-June 2021 93%
- COVID-19 case definitions, diagnostic testing criteria, and surveillance across the pandemic’s 25 highest burden countries 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.