Back

Reassessing the First Year of COVID-19: Estimating Infections and Tracking Pandemic Trends with Probabilistic Bias Analysis

Harkare, H. V.

2025-11-22 infectious diseases
10.1101/2025.11.21.25338950 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe novel SARS-CoV-2 virus, first identified in China in December 2019, rapidly spread worldwide, resulting in 114 million confirmed cases and 2.5 million reported deaths by February 28, 2021. Yet considerable uncertainty persists regarding the true scale of infections, as limited testing capacity and inconsistent surveillance substantially hindered accurate case detection. Robust estimates of infection burden are essential for understanding the pandemics full impact and guiding effective public health responses. MethodsThis study aimed to quantify the health burden of COVID-19 in India, Mexico, the United Kingdom, and the United States. A probabilistic bias analysis model is used to estimate the true number of SARS-CoV-2 infections, accounting for factors such as repeated testing, infection waves, and viral mutations to provide a more accurate assessment of the pandemics true scale in each country. ResultsBy February 28, 2021, the estimated total COVID-19 infections across India, Mexico, the United Kingdom, and the United States reached 286.7 million - more than six times the reported cases. India had the highest estimated infections (129.3 million), followed by the United States (98.6 million), Mexico (44.9 million), and the United Kingdom (14 million). Detection rates varied significantly, with Mexico underreporting infections by a factor of 22, while the United Kingdom and the United States had the highest detection rates. Testing capacity played a key role, with high-income countries conducting over four times more tests per 1,000 people than lower-income nations. ConclusionThis study demonstrating substantial underreporting of SARS-CoV-2 during the pre-vaccination period. These retrospective estimates provide a more accurate historical baseline for interpreting pandemic dynamics and remain valuable for assessing long-term health impacts and improving preparedness for future epidemics.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.0%
3
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.6%
5
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.1%
6
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
8
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.5%
10
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
11
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
15
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
16
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
19
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
20
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Journal of Travel Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.7%
26
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
27
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
29
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%