Neural dynamics outside task-coding dimensions drive decision trajectories through transient amplification
Pereira-Obilinovic, U.; Daie, K.; Chen, S.; Svoboda, K.; Darshan, R.
Show abstract
Linking neural activity to behavior typically involves identifying activity subspaces that encode task information, such as stimuli, memory, and choices. However, it is unclear whether activity in these "coding dimensions" drives behavior or merely reflects the underlying computations. Neural activity in other "residual dimensions" is typically ignored. We developed a recurrent neural network that explicitly models interactions between coding and residual subspaces. Applied to multi-regional Neuropixels recordings from mice performing a delayed movement task, the model reveals that perturbations of residual dimensions reliably alter behavior, whereas perturbations of the choice dimension, which encodes the animals decision, are less effective. These effects arise because residual dimensions drive amplification across an intermediate number ([~]10) of dimensions, before the dynamics settle into discrete attractors corresponding to choice. Our findings show that neural activity previously considered task-irrelevant can have critical roles in driving behavior.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Elucidating the Selection Mechanisms in Context-Dependent Computation through Low-Rank Neural Network Modeling 99%
- Invariant neural subspaces maintained by feedback modulation 98%
- Neural assemblies uncovered by generative modeling explain whole-brain activity statistics and reflect structural connectivity 98%
Similar papers in this journal
- Theory of Neuronal Perturbome: Linking Connectivity to Coding via Perturbations 98%
- Synaptic weight dynamics underlying memory consolidation: implications for learning rules, circuit organization, and circuit function 96%
- Random noise promotes slow heterogeneous synaptic dynamics important for robust working memory computation 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.