Back

Genomic evidence for co-evolution and sporadic host shifts in leishmaniaviruses

Heeren, S.; Motta Cantanhede, L.; Chourabi, K.; de Oliviera Santana, M. C.; Klaps, J.; Kostygov, A. Y.; Yurchenko, V.; Lemey, P.; Dujardin, J.-C.; Van den Broeck, F.; Cupolillo, E.

2025-12-16 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.11.20.685321 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AbstractThe evolutionary relationships between hosts and their symbionts offer valuable insights into the origins, maintenance, and consequences of biological interactions. While co-divergence and host-switching have been extensively explored in systems, such as Wolbachia-arthropod symbioses or viruses infecting vertebrates, similar investigations in protistan parasites remain scarce. The Leishmania-Leishmaniavirus (LRV) association offers a rare opportunity to study co-divergence in a medically relevant symbiotic system, in which the virus modulates the parasitic disease severity in humans. Here, we used total RNA sequencing to capture both the Leishmania transcriptome and the LRV genome simultaneously, enabling the first comprehensive investigation of the co-evolutionary history of Leishmania and LRV across different hierarchical levels (subgenus, species, and population). We found significant positive correlations between the parasite and viral genetic distances at both the subgenus (R2 = 0.89; F = 10,913.49; p < 0.001) and species level (focusing on L. (Viannia) spp.; R2 = 0.59; F = 1,254; p < 0.001). This was corroborated by additional co-phylogenetic methods (global-fit and event-based), indicating a strong pattern of phylogenetic congruence between Leishmania and LRV up to the species level. Only at the population level, focusing on the interactions of L. (V.) braziliensis and L. (V.) guyanensis with LRV1, we found weaker co-phylogenetic signals accompanied by more instances of intraspecific host switching. Overall and for the first time, our findings provide analytical evidence for the co-evolution between Leishmania and LRV, with co-speciation as the predominant process, while also shedding light on how such symbioses were maintained over long evolutionary time scales.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.6%
2
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.3%
3
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.9%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
6
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
7
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
10
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
14
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
15
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.3%
17
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
18
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.0%
20
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
24
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
25
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%