Back

Building process improvement capacity in epidemiologic research operations: The Nurses' Health Study experience

Bassett, L.; Patankar, V. V.; Lockhart, C.-l. N.; Mahoney, M. B.; Neville-Golden, J.; Palmer, T. L.; Romero, N.; Starr, J. R.

2025-11-21 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.11.20.25340660 medRxiv
Show abstract

With declining infrastructure funding for large-scale epidemiologic cohort studies, continuous process improvement is essential to sustain research quality and impact. The authors recently undertook a Lean Six Sigma (LSS) training initiative with operational staff of the Nurses Health Studies, among the longest-running and most productive cohort studies, to modernize operations and build internal capacity for process improvement. Twenty staff members across operational domains completed a structured LSS curriculum and three improvement projects: (1) reducing median turnaround time for medical record retrieval by 90%, (2) decreasing the proportion undeliverable questionnaires by 31%, and (3) cutting biweekly freezer maintenance time by 43 person-minutes per cycle, yielding an estimated 6.5 person-weeks annually. Staff reported substantial increases in understanding and confidence in applying process improvement methods. Fourteen trainees completed all requirements for LSS green-belt certification. Though some participants questioned the need to learn a specialized framework, most valued the collaborative, data-driven approach. This experience demonstrates that LSS can be successfully adapted to non-clinical trial epidemiologic research, improving efficiency and data quality. The results support broader adoption of structured continuous improvement efforts to enhance the sustainability of epidemiologic research platforms.

Published in American Journal of Epidemiology (predicted rank #14) · training set

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.