Building process improvement capacity in epidemiologic research operations: The Nurses' Health Study experience
Bassett, L.; Patankar, V. V.; Lockhart, C.-l. N.; Mahoney, M. B.; Neville-Golden, J.; Palmer, T. L.; Romero, N.; Starr, J. R.
Show abstract
With declining infrastructure funding for large-scale epidemiologic cohort studies, continuous process improvement is essential to sustain research quality and impact. The authors recently undertook a Lean Six Sigma (LSS) training initiative with operational staff of the Nurses Health Studies, among the longest-running and most productive cohort studies, to modernize operations and build internal capacity for process improvement. Twenty staff members across operational domains completed a structured LSS curriculum and three improvement projects: (1) reducing median turnaround time for medical record retrieval by 90%, (2) decreasing the proportion undeliverable questionnaires by 31%, and (3) cutting biweekly freezer maintenance time by 43 person-minutes per cycle, yielding an estimated 6.5 person-weeks annually. Staff reported substantial increases in understanding and confidence in applying process improvement methods. Fourteen trainees completed all requirements for LSS green-belt certification. Though some participants questioned the need to learn a specialized framework, most valued the collaborative, data-driven approach. This experience demonstrates that LSS can be successfully adapted to non-clinical trial epidemiologic research, improving efficiency and data quality. The results support broader adoption of structured continuous improvement efforts to enhance the sustainability of epidemiologic research platforms.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Essential Indicators of Quality in Primary Care Settings: An Evidence-Based, Structured, Expert Approach 94%
- Determinants of regulatory compliance in health and social care services: a systematic review using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research 93%
- Adapting COVID-19 research infrastructure to capture influenza and RSV alongside SARS-CoV-2 in UK healthcare workers winter 2022/23: Evaluation of the SIREN Winter Pressures pilot study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Agility and sustainability: A qualitative evaluation of COVID-19 Non-pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) in the UK logistics sector 94%
- Providing a safe, in-person, residential college experience during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- Staffing and Capacity Planning for SARS-CoV-2 Monoclonal Antibody Infusion Facilities: A Performance Estimation Calculator based on Discrete-Event Simulations 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Management of the COVID-19 health crisis: A survey in Swiss hospital pharmacies 91%
- ‘Leading from the front’ implementation strategies increase the success of influenza vaccination drives among healthcare workers: A reanalysis of Systematic Review evidence using Intervention Component Analysis (ICA) and Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) 90%
- A System Dynamics Model for Effects of Workplace Violence and Clinician Burnout on Agitation Management in the Emergency Department 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of healthcare worker shift scheduling on workforce preservation during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
- Rapid Response for Notification of Monkeypox Exposure, Exposure Risk Assessment and Stratification, and Symptom Monitoring 91%
- Navigating hospitals safely through the COVID-19 epidemic tide: predicting case load for adjusting bed capacity 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rising Through the Pandemic: A scoping review of quality improvement in public health during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
- How best do we engage the general population in testing for COVID-19? 90%
- COVID-19 Prevention at Institutions of Higher Education, United States, 2020 – 2021: Implementation of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.