Back

Proteogenomic profiling of soft tissue leiomyosarcoma reveals distinct molecular subtypes with divergent outcomes and therapeutic vulnerabilities

Tanaka, A.; Ogawa, M.; Otani, Y.; Hendrickson, R. C.; Zhuoning, L.; Agaram, N. P.; Klimstra, D. S.; Wang, J. Y.; Wei, W.; Roehrl, M. H. A.

2026-03-27 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.11.19.689365 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Soft tissue leiomyosarcoma (STLMS) is an aggressive malignancy for which robust molecular subclassification and mechanism-based therapeutic strategies still remain limited. We performed integrative proteogenomic analyses of primary and metastatic STLMS to define subtype-associated molecular programs. Joint analysis of the proteome and phosphoproteome identified 3 biologically distinct subtypes. P1 was characterized by relative genomic stability, low proliferative activity, and enrichment of FGFR2- and PDK-associated signaling. In contrast, P2 and P3 showed greater chromosomal instability and more aggressive clinical behavior, but with distinct molecular features. Notably, P2 was associated with inflammatory and RTK-RAS pathway programs, activation of CDK-AURKA/B-mTOR-ERK kinase networks, IGF1R/PDGFRA alterations, and the poorest outcomes. On the other hand, P3 showed strong cell cycle and DNA repair programs, elevated NCOR1 expression, and increased expression of nonhomologous end joining components, including PARP1. Homologous recombination deficiency analyses distinguished HRD-low P1 from HRD-high P2/P3, and paired analyses suggested increased HRD-related features in metastatic lesions within P3. Immune profiling identified an immune-hot yet potentially suppressive state in P2, marked by higher LGALS9 expression and M2-like macrophage infiltration. To support clinical translation, we developed a tissue microarray-based immunohistochemical classifier that enabled surrogate assignment of proteome-defined subtypes in an independent cohort and showed recurrence-free survival differences across inferred subtypes. These findings together establish a proteogenomic framework for STLMS heterogeneity and nominate subtype-associated biological vulnerabilities for future translational and clinical investigation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 10%
14.4%
2
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
3
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
4
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
5
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
8
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
9
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
10
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
11
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.7%
13
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.7%
14
Molecular Cancer Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.2%
17
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
18
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
19
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
21
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
22
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
25
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.7%
27
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
28
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
29
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
NAR Cancer
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%