Proteogenomic profiling of soft tissue leiomyosarcoma reveals distinct molecular subtypes with divergent outcomes and therapeutic vulnerabilities
Tanaka, A.; Ogawa, M.; Otani, Y.; Hendrickson, R. C.; Zhuoning, L.; Agaram, N. P.; Klimstra, D. S.; Wang, J. Y.; Wei, W.; Roehrl, M. H. A.
Show abstract
Soft tissue leiomyosarcoma (STLMS) is an aggressive malignancy for which robust molecular subclassification and mechanism-based therapeutic strategies still remain limited. We performed integrative proteogenomic analyses of primary and metastatic STLMS to define subtype-associated molecular programs. Joint analysis of the proteome and phosphoproteome identified 3 biologically distinct subtypes. P1 was characterized by relative genomic stability, low proliferative activity, and enrichment of FGFR2- and PDK-associated signaling. In contrast, P2 and P3 showed greater chromosomal instability and more aggressive clinical behavior, but with distinct molecular features. Notably, P2 was associated with inflammatory and RTK-RAS pathway programs, activation of CDK-AURKA/B-mTOR-ERK kinase networks, IGF1R/PDGFRA alterations, and the poorest outcomes. On the other hand, P3 showed strong cell cycle and DNA repair programs, elevated NCOR1 expression, and increased expression of nonhomologous end joining components, including PARP1. Homologous recombination deficiency analyses distinguished HRD-low P1 from HRD-high P2/P3, and paired analyses suggested increased HRD-related features in metastatic lesions within P3. Immune profiling identified an immune-hot yet potentially suppressive state in P2, marked by higher LGALS9 expression and M2-like macrophage infiltration. To support clinical translation, we developed a tissue microarray-based immunohistochemical classifier that enabled surrogate assignment of proteome-defined subtypes in an independent cohort and showed recurrence-free survival differences across inferred subtypes. These findings together establish a proteogenomic framework for STLMS heterogeneity and nominate subtype-associated biological vulnerabilities for future translational and clinical investigation.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.