Ancestral Sequences Cannot be Accurately Reconstructed via Interpolation in a Variational Autoencoder's Latent Space
Gorstein, E.; Tang, M.; Bruzzone, H.; Solis-Lemus, C.
Show abstract
Standard methods for ancestral sequence reconstruction (ASR) rely on substitution models for the residues in a biological sequence and assume independent evolution across these sites, ignoring the epistatic interactions that shape molecular evolution. In contrast, deep learning models like variational autoencoders (VAEs) can learn low-dimensional representations ("embeddings") of sequences in a protein family that may implicitly handle these dependencies, raising the possibility of performing more accurate ASR by interpolating between extant sequence embeddings within the VAE's latent space. In this study, we test this hypothesis by developing and evaluating a VAE-based ASR pipeline. Benchmarking this approach against established likelihood-based and parsimony methods using various simulations of protein evolution, including scenarios with and without epistasis, we find that the VAE-based approach is consistently and significantly outperformed by standard methods, even in epistatic regimes where it was hypothesized to have an advantage. We further show that this failure is not due to a lack of phylogenetic structure in the latent space, which does contain evolutionary signal. Rather, the primary limitation is the information loss inherent to the autoencoding process: the VAE's decoder cannot generate sequences with sufficient fidelity for the precise demands of ASR.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.