Traceable Value Assignment of a VLP Derived HIV 1 p24 Antigen Material Using a Single Point Calibration Framework with Dilution Control Verification
Khoroshun, E.; Momynaliev, K.; Ivanov, I.
Show abstract
Accurate quantification of HIV-1 p24 antigen depends on the availability of reference materials whose values are traceable to the International Unit (IU). The long-standing WHO International Standard 90/636 is now largely depleted, while access to more recent VLP-based standards remains limited, creating a practical need for locally produced materials supported by a robust and internationally traceable value-assignment procedure. We developed a streamlined, two-component framework for assigning p24 activity to a VLP-derived material using (i) single-point calibration against the WHO standard and (ii) verification through an internal dilution control prepared from the same material. A multi-laboratory study involving 16 laboratories and 37 fourth-generation Ag/Ab assays demonstrated that the approach yields stable relative-response measures and supports the use of robust statistics for activity estimation. Phylogenetic analysis confirmed that the VLP material corresponds to HIV-1 subtype B, ensuring biological alignment with existing WHO standards. The combined procedure produced an assigned value of 32 IU per vial, with dilution-control behaviour indicating correct preparation and consistent analytical parallelism across platforms. This methodology provides a reproducible, resource-efficient route for establishing traceable VLP-based p24 reference materials in settings where access to international standards or large collaborative studies is limited.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Analytical performance of 17 commercially available point-of-care tests for CRP to support patient management at lower levels of the health system 95%
- A High-throughput Microsphere-based Immunoassay of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM Testing for COVID-19 Diagnostics 94%
- Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Point of Care Devices in the Laboratory and Clinical Setting 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid semi-quantitative point of care diagnostic test for post vaccination antibody monitoring 95%
- Comparison of LIAISON QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus with QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus 95%
- A Reagent and Virus Benchmarking Panel for a Uniform Analytical Performance Assessment of N Antigen–Based Diagnostic Tests for COVID-19 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impaired performance of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid tests at elevated temperatures 95%
- Pushing beyond specifications: Evaluation of linearity and clinical performance of a fully automated SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay for reliable quantification in blood and other materials outside recommendations 94%
- Handling and accuracy of four rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 compared to RT-qPCR 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- mbctools: A User-Friendly Metabarcoding and Cross-Platform Pipeline for Analyzing Multiple Amplicon Sequencing Data across a Large Diversity of Organisms 87%
- Parchment Glutamine Index (PQI): A novel method to estimate glutamine deamidation levels in parchment collagen obtained from low-quality MALDI-TOF data 86%
- HIV self-testing positivity rate and linkage to confirmatory testing and care: a telephone survey in Côte d’Ivoire, Mali and Senegal 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Retrospective and prospective studies evaluating the performance of the SARS-Cov-2 “AQ+ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test” from InTec on symptomatic and non-symptomatic patients 94%
- Agile design and development of a high throughput cobas ® SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR diagnostic test 93%
- High-sensitive detection and quantitation of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) from capillary/fingerstick and venepuncture whole-blood using fluorescence-based rapid lateral flow Immunoassay (LFIA) 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.