Factors influencing nurses susceptibility to online health misinformation: evidence from Greece
Katsiroumpa, A.; Moisoglou, I.; Konstantakopoulou, O.; Galanis, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe ability to identify and counteract misinformation in healthcare is more critical than ever to safeguard public health and maintain confidence in evidence-based practices. ObjectiveTo identify predictors of online health misinformation in nurses. In particular, we examined the association between several demographic variables, trust in scientists and online health misinformation susceptibility. MethodsA cross-sectional study was carried out in Greece, with data collected through an online survey conducted in October 2025. We used the Health-Related Online Misinformation Susceptibility Scale to measure online health misinformation susceptibility in our nurses. We used the Trust in Scientists Scale to measure levels of trust in scientists. ResultsWe found that trust in scientists reduces online health misinformation susceptibility (adjusted coefficient beta = -3.290, 95% confidence interval [CI] = - 4.687 to -1.893, p<0.001). Moreover, we found that nurses with a MSc/PhD diploma had lower levels of misinformation susceptibility (adjusted coefficient beta = -2.470, 95% CI = -4.428 to -0.512, p=0.014). Additionally, interest in politics was associated with reduced misinformation susceptibility (adjusted coefficient beta = -0.794, 95% CI = -1.119 to -0.469, p<0.001). ConclusionOur findings showed that nurses who trusted scientists had also less online health misinformation susceptibility. Additionally, educational level and interest in politics affected online health misinformation susceptibility. Policy makers and healthcare organizations should reduce nurses misinformation susceptibility and improve their ability to detect fake news.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Healthcare workers’ mental health and wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic: Longitudinal analysis of interview and social media data 92%
- Has the pandemic enhanced and sustained digital health-seeking behaviour? A big data interrupted time-series analysis of Google Trends 92%
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Chatbots in Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: A Systematic Review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Stressors, Manifestations and Course of COVID-19 Related Distress Among Nurses and Midwives in Tasmania 92%
- Nurses’ experience of using video consultation in a digital care setting and its impact on their workflow and communication 92%
- Key topics in pandemic health risk communication: A qualitative study of expert opinions and knowledge 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and use analysis of ‘gestioemocional.cat’, a web app for promoting emotional self-care and access to professional mental health resources during the covid-19 pandemic 92%
- (Mis) Communicating The Gut Microbiome: A Cross-Sectional Assessment of Social Media Video Content 91%
- Individual factors influencing public’s perceptions about the importance of COVID-19 immunity certificates: a cross-sectional online questionnaire survey in the UK 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Examining Australian's beliefs, misconceptions, and sources of information for COVID-19: A national online survey 92%
- The negative consequences of failing to communicate uncertainties during a pandemic: The case of COVID-19 vaccines 91%
- A conceptual model for pluralistic healthcare behavior: results from a qualitative study in southwestern Uganda 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Anxiety, depression, and insomnia among nurses during the full liberalization of COVID-19: A multicenter cross-sectional analysis of the high-income region in China 92%
- Machine Learning in Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy Education: A Survey of Postgraduate Students at a Swiss University 91%
- Applying machine-learning to rapidly analyse large qualitative text datasets to inform the COVID-19 pandemic response: Comparing human and machine-assisted topic analysis techniques 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.