Back

Equity_Adjusted Safe_Delivery Thresholds: A Global Causal Analysis of Institutional Birth Coverage and Maternal Mortality in 182 Countries, 2000 to 2022

Adetunji, S. A.; Adetunji, O. C.; Oyewusi, R. O.

2025-11-20 obstetrics and gynecology
10.1101/2025.11.19.25340569 medRxiv
Show abstract

AbstractsO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSMaternal mortality remains far above the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) target in many settings, and global strategies lack an empirically derived coverage threshold for "safe" delivery. MethodsWe assembled a longitudinal panel of 2 184 country-year observations from 182 countries (2000-22), linking UN Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-agency Group estimates with WHO and World Bank indicators. The primary exposure was institutional-birth coverage (% of livebirths in health facilities); the outcome was maternal mortality ratio (MMR; deaths per 100 000 livebirths). Using two-way fixed-effects models with restricted cubic splines, adjusted for anaemia prevalence and adolescent birth rate, we estimated the within-country association between institutional births and log(MMR). We then applied Hansen-type panel threshold regression to identify coverage levels at which the slope of this association changed, and repeated analyses by WHO region. FindingsMedian institutional-birth coverage was 72{middle dot}4% (IQR 54{middle dot}2-90{middle dot}7) and median MMR 173 deaths per 100 000 livebirths (81-328). Globally, each 10-percentage-point increase in institutional births was associated with a 7{middle dot}8% (95% CI 6{middle dot}1-9{middle dot}5) reduction in log(MMR). Threshold analysis identified a single global inflection at 70{middle dot}2% coverage (95% CI [~]68-72). Below this threshold, each 10-point increase in institutional births was associated with a 12{middle dot}6% (10{middle dot}2-14{middle dot}8) reduction in log(MMR), compared with 4{middle dot}1% (2{middle dot}5-5{middle dot}7) above the threshold--an almost three-fold difference in marginal effect. Region-specific thresholds ranged from 65% in the African Region to over 90% in the Western Pacific. InterpretationSeventy per cent institutional-birth coverage represents a "safe-delivery" threshold: below this level, expanding facility births yields large reductions in maternal mortality; above it, further gains require investments in quality of care, emergency obstetric capacity, and equity. Embedding this empirically derived threshold into SDG 3{middle dot}1 and universal health coverage monitoring could sharpen accountability, guide resource allocation, and accelerate progress towards ending preventable maternal deaths. FundingNone.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
25.6%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 7%
18.0%
3
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.2%
5
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.3%
6
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
7
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
8
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
9
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.6%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.9%
12
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.5%
15
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
16
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.2%
17
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.9%
19
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
24
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%