Back

Equity_Adjusted Safe_Delivery Thresholds: A Global Causal Analysis of Institutional Birth Coverage and Maternal Mortality in 182 Countries, 2000 to 2022

Adetunji, S. A.; Adetunji, O. C.; Oyewusi, R. O.

2025-11-20 obstetrics and gynecology
10.1101/2025.11.19.25340569 medRxiv
Show abstract

AbstractsO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSMaternal mortality remains far above the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) target in many settings, and global strategies lack an empirically derived coverage threshold for "safe" delivery. MethodsWe assembled a longitudinal panel of 2 184 country-year observations from 182 countries (2000-22), linking UN Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-agency Group estimates with WHO and World Bank indicators. The primary exposure was institutional-birth coverage (% of livebirths in health facilities); the outcome was maternal mortality ratio (MMR; deaths per 100 000 livebirths). Using two-way fixed-effects models with restricted cubic splines, adjusted for anaemia prevalence and adolescent birth rate, we estimated the within-country association between institutional births and log(MMR). We then applied Hansen-type panel threshold regression to identify coverage levels at which the slope of this association changed, and repeated analyses by WHO region. FindingsMedian institutional-birth coverage was 72{middle dot}4% (IQR 54{middle dot}2-90{middle dot}7) and median MMR 173 deaths per 100 000 livebirths (81-328). Globally, each 10-percentage-point increase in institutional births was associated with a 7{middle dot}8% (95% CI 6{middle dot}1-9{middle dot}5) reduction in log(MMR). Threshold analysis identified a single global inflection at 70{middle dot}2% coverage (95% CI [~]68-72). Below this threshold, each 10-point increase in institutional births was associated with a 12{middle dot}6% (10{middle dot}2-14{middle dot}8) reduction in log(MMR), compared with 4{middle dot}1% (2{middle dot}5-5{middle dot}7) above the threshold--an almost three-fold difference in marginal effect. Region-specific thresholds ranged from 65% in the African Region to over 90% in the Western Pacific. InterpretationSeventy per cent institutional-birth coverage represents a "safe-delivery" threshold: below this level, expanding facility births yields large reductions in maternal mortality; above it, further gains require investments in quality of care, emergency obstetric capacity, and equity. Embedding this empirically derived threshold into SDG 3{middle dot}1 and universal health coverage monitoring could sharpen accountability, guide resource allocation, and accelerate progress towards ending preventable maternal deaths. FundingNone.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.