Back

Impact of depression on treatment progression in type 2 diabetes: A UK retrospective cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum database

Gillett, A. C.; Handley, D.; Bala, R.; Young, K. G.; Tyrrell, J. G.; Lewis, C.

2025-11-20 endocrinology
10.1101/2025.11.19.25340563 medRxiv
Show abstract

AimsTo investigate the association between depression history, timing, and progression of diabetes treatment in type 2 diabetes (T2D). MethodsWe conducted a cohort study using primary care records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum database (2011-2023). Adults with T2D initiating oral glucose-lowering monotherapy (index) were included. Depression history, identified using clinical codes, was categorised by the most recent code before index: recent ([≤]1.7 years), intermediate (1.7-12.8 years), distant (>12.8 years), or none. Outcomes were time to treatment intensification (adding or switching drug class) and insulin initiation. We used Royston-Parmar survival models to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for demographic and clinical variables. ResultsAmong 378,935 included individuals, 25.1% had a history of depression. Compared with no prior depression, recent depression was associated with higher odds of treatment intensification (OR 1.20, 95% CI: 1.17-1.23) and insulin initiation (OR 1.29, 95% CI: 1.23-1.36). Intermediate and distant depression were also associated with higher progression-odds, though more modestly. ConclusionsDepression, particularly recent episodes, is associated with earlier treatment progression in T2D, highlighting the importance of integrating mental and physical healthcare in diabetes management.

Published in Primary Care Diabetes · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.