Back

Title: A Randomized Hybrid Type I Effectiveness-Implementation Study of an eHealth Delivery Alternative for Cancer Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer (eREACH2): study protocol

Mastaglio, E.; Egleston, B.; Lee, K. T.; Fetzer, D.; Brown, S.; Domchek, S. M.; Fleisher, L.; Wen, K.-Y.; Wagner, L.; Roberts, S.; Cacioppo, C.; Christiansen, J.; Howe, S.; Wood, E. M.; Weinberg, M.; Karpink, K.; Selmani, E.; Feng, J.; John, S.; Schweickert, K.; Mcleod, B.; Bradbury, A. F.

2025-11-22 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2025.11.19.25340515 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundGermline cancer genetic testing has become a standard evidence-based practice, with established risk reduction and cancer screening guidelines for genetic carriers. There are also targeted treatments for some genetic carriers with cancers such as breast and ovarian cancer. Yet, many at-risk patients do not have access to genetic services, leaving many genetic carriers unidentified. The eREACH 2 study (A Randomized Hybrid Type I Effectiveness-Implementation Study of an eReach Delivery Alternative for Cancer Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer) evaluates whether an interactive, patient-centered digital alternative for genetic education and disclosure of results is non-inferior compared to the traditional model of pre-and post-test counseling with a genetic counselor. MethodsThis is a Hybrid Type 1 effectiveness implementation study in which participants are randomized using a 2x2 design to test a self-directed, patient-informed, digital intervention to deliver clinical genetic testing versus the traditional pre-test (visit 1) and post-test (visit 2: disclosure) counseling delivered by a genetic counselor. The 4 arms include A) genetic counselor for visit 1 and visit 2, B) genetic counselor for visit 1 and digital intervention for visit 2, C) digital intervention for visit 1 and genetic counselor for visit 2, and D) digital intervention for both visits. Participants are adults who meet National Comprehensive Cancer Network and/or American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines for germline genetic testing and are recruited from both community and medical sites across the United States by way of clinician referral as well as patient self-referral. The primary outcomes are non-inferiority in uptake of genetic testing and change in genetic knowledge and general anxiety from baseline to post-disclosure. DiscussionWith many barriers to accessing genetic services, innovative delivery models are needed to address these gaps and increase uptake of genetic services. The eREACH2 study evaluates the effectiveness of an interactive patient-centered digital intervention to deliver clinical genetic testing. We expect this work will inform evidence-based guidelines and the standard-of-care for delivery of genetic testing and is designed to be broadly applicable and easily adaptable for other populations and settings even beyond oncology (e.g. Alzheimers disease). Trial registrationThis protocol was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05427240) on 6/7/2022.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genetics in Medicine
78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
31.1%
2
Genetics in Medicine Open
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.5%
4
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Value in Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
6
Trials
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
7
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
8
npj Genomic Medicine
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
9
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
10
European Journal of Human Genetics
58 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
11
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.7%
13
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
The Journal of Pediatrics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
17
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
18
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Alzheimer's & Dementia
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
22
Genetic Epidemiology
55 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
23
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
24
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%