Title: A Randomized Hybrid Type I Effectiveness-Implementation Study of an eHealth Delivery Alternative for Cancer Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer (eREACH2): study protocol
Mastaglio, E.; Egleston, B.; Lee, K. T.; Fetzer, D.; Brown, S.; Domchek, S. M.; Fleisher, L.; Wen, K.-Y.; Wagner, L.; Roberts, S.; Cacioppo, C.; Christiansen, J.; Howe, S.; Wood, E. M.; Weinberg, M.; Karpink, K.; Selmani, E.; Feng, J.; John, S.; Schweickert, K.; Mcleod, B.; Bradbury, A. F.
Show abstract
BackgroundGermline cancer genetic testing has become a standard evidence-based practice, with established risk reduction and cancer screening guidelines for genetic carriers. There are also targeted treatments for some genetic carriers with cancers such as breast and ovarian cancer. Yet, many at-risk patients do not have access to genetic services, leaving many genetic carriers unidentified. The eREACH 2 study (A Randomized Hybrid Type I Effectiveness-Implementation Study of an eReach Delivery Alternative for Cancer Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer) evaluates whether an interactive, patient-centered digital alternative for genetic education and disclosure of results is non-inferior compared to the traditional model of pre-and post-test counseling with a genetic counselor. MethodsThis is a Hybrid Type 1 effectiveness implementation study in which participants are randomized using a 2x2 design to test a self-directed, patient-informed, digital intervention to deliver clinical genetic testing versus the traditional pre-test (visit 1) and post-test (visit 2: disclosure) counseling delivered by a genetic counselor. The 4 arms include A) genetic counselor for visit 1 and visit 2, B) genetic counselor for visit 1 and digital intervention for visit 2, C) digital intervention for visit 1 and genetic counselor for visit 2, and D) digital intervention for both visits. Participants are adults who meet National Comprehensive Cancer Network and/or American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines for germline genetic testing and are recruited from both community and medical sites across the United States by way of clinician referral as well as patient self-referral. The primary outcomes are non-inferiority in uptake of genetic testing and change in genetic knowledge and general anxiety from baseline to post-disclosure. DiscussionWith many barriers to accessing genetic services, innovative delivery models are needed to address these gaps and increase uptake of genetic services. The eREACH2 study evaluates the effectiveness of an interactive patient-centered digital intervention to deliver clinical genetic testing. We expect this work will inform evidence-based guidelines and the standard-of-care for delivery of genetic testing and is designed to be broadly applicable and easily adaptable for other populations and settings even beyond oncology (e.g. Alzheimers disease). Trial registrationThis protocol was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05427240) on 6/7/2022.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and evaluation of a novel educational program for providers on the use of polygenic risk scores 96%
- Using Coincidence Analysis to Identify Causal Chains of Factors Associated with Implementation and Optimization of Lynch Syndrome Tumor Screening Across Multiple Health care Systems 93%
- A Systematic Review of the Methodological Quality of Economic Evaluations in Genetic Screening and Testing for Monogenic Disorders 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Pooled Electronic Consultation Program to Improve Access to Genetics Specialists 92%
- Evaluation of DNA-poli: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial to assess a digital platform for family cascade genetic testing and predictive genetic counselling 91%
- Combining rare and common genetic variants improves population risk stratification for breast cancer 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- The NYCKidSeq project: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial incorporating genomics into the clinical care of diverse New York City children 92%
- The Melanoma Genomics Managing Your Risk Study randomised controlled trial: Statistical Analysis Plan 91%
- Rationale and design of the Learning Implementation of Guideline-based decision support system for Hypertension Treatment (LIGHT) Trial and LIGHT-ACD Trial 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.