Back

Challenging mtDNA tRNA Variant Guidelines: Emphasizing Single-Cell Analysis through Four Novel Variants

Prosper, C.; Zereg, E.; Chaussenot, A.; Bannwarth, S.; Lannes, B.; Streichenberger, N.; Kaphan, E.; Nadaj-Pakleza, A.; Masingue, M.; Villa, L.; Sacconi, S.; Francou, B.; Ait-El-Mkadem Saadi, S.; Fragaki, K.; Paquis-Flucklinger, V.; Rouzier, C.

2025-11-22 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2025.11.19.25339649 medRxiv
Show abstract

The broad clinical and genetic heterogeneity of mitochondrial diseases makes diagnosis challenging. Accurate characterization of novel variants is crucial to reduce diagnostic uncertainty, guide treatment, and enable reliable genetic counseling. In this study, we validated a single-cell NGS-based analysis approach by comparison with conventional PCR-RFLP and applied it to five mtDNA VUS identified in patients evaluated at our national reference center for mitochondrial disorders (CALISSON). Variant interpretation was assessed using multiple frameworks, including Yarhams scoring, Wongs specifications, and the ClinGen guidelines, highlighting differences between these scoring systems and the limitations of current recommendations in fully integrating functional evidence and tissue segregation data. We implemented a classification approach that incorporates these aspects to achieve a more clinically meaningful interpretation. This analysis enabled the reclassification of four novel variants (m.9998T>C in MT-TG, m.7530A>G in MT-TD, and m.4271G>C and m.4305A>G in MT-TI), providing a definitive molecular diagnosis. Further validation on a larger set of variants will be required, as well as the establishment of standardized criteria for single-fiber analyses, including minimum fiber numbers, thresholds for COX-negative fibers, and statistical significance. Overall, this study underscores the critical importance of integrating robust functional evidence into mtDNA variant interpretation and provides insights for refining existing guidelines to improve diagnostic accuracy and support clinical decision-making.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Mitochondrion
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.4%
3
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
5
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
6
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
7
NAR Molecular Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
9
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
10
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
11
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
12
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
15
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
17
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
18
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
19
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
20
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
21
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
22
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
23
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
24
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.0%
25
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
26
Human Genetics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
27
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
28
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Journal of Advanced Research
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%