Computational Inference of Metabolic Programs: A Case Study Analyzing the Effect of BRCA1 Loss
Masid, M.; Rota, I. A.; Barras, D.; De Carlo, F.; Ginefra, P.; Desbuisson, M.; Ortiz-Miranda, Y.; Zamarin, D.; Shah, S. P.; Vannini, N.; Coukos, G.; Dangaj-Laniti, D.; Hatzimanikatis, V.
Show abstract
Metabolic reprogramming is a hallmark of cancer, yet how oncogenic drivers shape tumor metabolism across disease progression remains incompletely understood. In this study, we present iMSEA (in silico Metabolic State and Enrichment Analysis), a computational framework that infers flux-based metabolic states from omics profiles. Applying iMSEA to isogenic BRCA1-mutant and BRCA1-wild-type ovarian cancer cells, we identified a shift toward glycolysis, nucleotide biosynthesis, and redox imbalance, coupled with impaired oxidative phosphorylation. These predictions were validated with metabolomics, Seahorse, and SCENITH assays, demonstrating the accuracy of our approach. Extending the analysis to homologous recombination deficient patient tumors at single-cell resolution, we found that BRCA1-deficient cancers display heightened metabolic activity and site-specific adaptations, including altered central carbon fluxes, mitochondrial function, nucleotide biosynthesis, and lipid metabolism. By linking transcriptional programs to functional metabolic states, iMSEA reveals hidden metabolic liabilities in BRCA1-deficient ovarian cancer and provides a broadly applicable strategy for dissecting metabolic heterogeneity and therapeutic vulnerabilities in cancer.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Cancer cells depend on environmental lipids for proliferation when electron acceptors are limited 96%
- Hexokinase detachment from mitochondria drives the Warburg effect to support compartmentalized ATP production 94%
- Nitrogen metabolism profiling reveals cell state-specific pyrimidine synthesis pathway choice 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.