Perceiving Instability: How Expectations Bias Sensorimotor Processing in Balance Control
Parr, J. V. V.; Mills, R.; Kal, E. C.; Bronstein, A. M.; Ellmers, T. J.
Show abstract
Maintaining balance requires rapid integration of sensory input with top-down sensorimotor predictions. Predictive coding frameworks propose that mismatches between expected and actual sensory input ("prediction errors") drive perceptual inference. Although these frameworks have been highly influential in sensory neuroscience, it remains unclear whether they operate similarly in fast-acting sensorimotor systems such as human balance. Using electroencephalography (EEG) and discrete postural perturbations via support surface translations, we independently manipulated expectations and sensory input. Participants were primed to expect small or large perturbations, with occasional violations in which the delivered perturbation differed from expectation. We found that subjective perception of instability was shaped by expectation alone, regardless of perturbation magnitude. Similarly, pre-perturbation beta-band suppression and post-perturbation gamma activity tracked expected perturbation magnitude, with the latter strongly associated with expectation-induced perceptual biases (r = 0.69, pBON = 0.001). In contrast, both the balance N1 (a well-established stimulus-evoked cortical potential linked to the postural response) and objective behavioural markers of postural instability were determined primarily by perturbation magnitude. Crucially, neither perception nor early neural or behavioural markers appeared to encode prediction errors arising from expectation violations. Together, these findings identify boundary conditions on predictive coding in sensorimotor control, showing that during fast, reactive behaviour, perceptual inference may be shaped more strongly by expectations than by mismatch signals, even as early neural and motor responses remain driven primarily by sensory input. Significance StatementPerception is often explained through predictive coding, a framework in which the brain compares incoming sensory input with internal expectations and updates representations based on mismatches, or prediction errors. However, it remains unclear whether these perceptual inference processes operate similarly in fast, ecologically relevant sensorimotor systems, such as postural control. Our results show that top-down expectations shape perceptual experience and early cortical responses to postural perturbations, even when sensory input contradicts those expectations. Notably, these early neural markers showed limited sensitivity to prediction errors in this rapid, reactive context. Together, these findings identify conditions under which perceptual inference may rely more strongly on expectations than on sensory mismatch, refining predictive coding accounts of fast, reactive behaviour. ClassificationBiological Science (Neuroscience)
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cortical response to balance perturbation is more sensitive in modern dancers than nondancers during biomechanically similar balance recovery 96%
- Smooth pursuit eye movements contribute to long-latency reflex modulation in the lower extremity 94%
- Kinematic and neuromuscular characterization of cognitive involvement in gait control in healthy young adults 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinct cortical correlates of perception and motor function in balance control 96%
- A cortical mechanism linking saliency detection and motor reactivity in rhesus monkeys 94%
- Double dissociation of spontaneous alpha-band activity and pupil-linked arousal on additive and multiplicative perceptual gain 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Balance Control Mechanisms Do Not Benefit From Successive Stimulation Of Different Sensory Systems 93%
- Neurocognitive Dynamics of Preparatory and Adaptive Cognitive Control: Insights from Mass-Univariate and Multivariate Pattern Analysis of EEG data 92%
- Quantifying exploration in reward-based motor learning 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.