Infarctsize-AI: an efficient infarct size image analysis tool for small rodent myocardial infarction studies
Kovacshazi, C.; Kapui, D.; Weber, B. Y.; Gergely, T. G.; Brenner, G. B.; Agg, B.; Tabajdi, C.; Racz, A.; Horvath, A.; Hernandez-Resendiz, S.; Hausenloy, D. J.; Vilskersts, R.; Okninska, M.; Waszkiewicz, M.; Maczewski, M.; Molnar, A.; Szabados, T.; Bencsik, P.; Krieg, T.; Inserter, J.; Schulz, R.; Zuurbier, C. J.; Andreadou, I.; Podesser, B. K.; Ferdinandy, P.; Giricz, Z.
Show abstract
BackgroundMyocardial infarct size (IS) is the gold standard end-point in shorth-term studies on cardioprotection. However, IS quantification in rodent models with standard Evans Blue and 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining is time-consuming and prone to inter-observer variance. Therefore, we aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based application to reduce time and inter-observer variability of IS analysis in rodent acute myocardial infarction (MI) models. MethodsWe used TTC/Evans blue-stained heart slice images of independent laboratories from previously published projects. Rat (n = 325 and 248 slices) and mouse (n = 77 slices) datasets were used to train deep learning segmentation models with three different neural network architectures, which were combined into a single AI analysis. AI analysis was compared with manual analysis on rat data from a training laboratory (internal data, n = 496 slices, n = 41 whole-hearts) and data from independent laboratories (external data, n = 60 and 62 slices). Additionally, two independent evaluators performed manual and AI-assisted analysis, consisting of AI-analysis and its manual correction, on internal (n = 36 slices) and external data (n = 37 slices). ResultsLins concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) between IS/AAR values from manual and AI analysis was 0.844 with 95% CI of [0.814; 0.869] for images of internal data heart slices. On external data heart slices, AI accurately annotated slice area and AAR but failed to annotate infarcted area. On internal whole-heart data, CCC between AI and AI-assisted IS/AAR was 0.894 with 95% CI of [0.812; 0.942]. AI-assisted analysis reduced evaluation time on both internal and external datasets and increased region overlap for AAR between the two independent evaluators on dependent data. ConclusionsAI-assisted analysis significantly reduced analysis time and inter-observer variability. For optimal performance, lab-specific AI training is recommended. Infarctsize-AI is available at https://infarctsize.com. Translational perspectiveMyocardial infarct size (IS) is the gold-standard end-point in shorth-term studies to assess potential cardioprotective therapies against acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, IS quantification in rodent AMI models is time-consuming and prone to inter-observer variance. Therefore, we developed an AI-based software that can reduce analysis time and inter-observer variability and facilitate documentation, which facilitates the clinical translation of potential cardioprotective therapies. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=34 SRC="FIGDIR/small/688527v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (15K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@187c938org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1ab8bb4org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@160dc68org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@264617_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Open-Source Low-Cost Cardiac Optical Mapping System 95%
- {-}CardiOvascular examination in awake Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus pygmaeus): Low-stress Echocardiography including Speckle Tracking imaging (the COOLEST method) 94%
- ai-corona : Radiologist-Assistant Deep Learning Framework for COVID-19 Diagnosis in Chest CT Scans 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of the second-generation whole-heart motion correction algorithm (SSF2) used to demonstrate the aortic annulus on cardiac CT 95%
- AngioNet: A Convolutional Neural Network for Vessel Segmentation in X-ray Angiography 95%
- Reproducibility of 4D Flow MRI-based Personalized Cardiovascular Models; Inter-sequence, Intra-observer, and Inter-observer variability 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated IntraVascular UltraSound Image Processing and Quantification of Coronary Artery Anomalies: The AIVUS-CAA software 96%
- Digitizing ECG image: new fully automated method and open-source software code 95%
- BRAVEHEART: Open-source software for automated electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep learning-based end-to-end automated stenosis classification and localization on catheter coronary angiography 97%
- Fairness in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Assessing sex and racial bias in deep learning-based segmentation 95%
- DeepStrain: A Deep Learning Workflow for the Automated Characterization of Cardiac Mechanics 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.