Back

Infarctsize-AI: an efficient infarct size image analysis tool for small rodent myocardial infarction studies

Kovacshazi, C.; Kapui, D.; Weber, B. Y.; Gergely, T. G.; Brenner, G. B.; Agg, B.; Tabajdi, C.; Racz, A.; Horvath, A.; Hernandez-Resendiz, S.; Hausenloy, D. J.; Vilskersts, R.; Okninska, M.; Waszkiewicz, M.; Maczewski, M.; Molnar, A.; Szabados, T.; Bencsik, P.; Krieg, T.; Inserter, J.; Schulz, R.; Zuurbier, C. J.; Andreadou, I.; Podesser, B. K.; Ferdinandy, P.; Giricz, Z.

2025-11-18 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.11.18.688527 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMyocardial infarct size (IS) is the gold standard end-point in shorth-term studies on cardioprotection. However, IS quantification in rodent models with standard Evans Blue and 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining is time-consuming and prone to inter-observer variance. Therefore, we aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based application to reduce time and inter-observer variability of IS analysis in rodent acute myocardial infarction (MI) models. MethodsWe used TTC/Evans blue-stained heart slice images of independent laboratories from previously published projects. Rat (n = 325 and 248 slices) and mouse (n = 77 slices) datasets were used to train deep learning segmentation models with three different neural network architectures, which were combined into a single AI analysis. AI analysis was compared with manual analysis on rat data from a training laboratory (internal data, n = 496 slices, n = 41 whole-hearts) and data from independent laboratories (external data, n = 60 and 62 slices). Additionally, two independent evaluators performed manual and AI-assisted analysis, consisting of AI-analysis and its manual correction, on internal (n = 36 slices) and external data (n = 37 slices). ResultsLins concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) between IS/AAR values from manual and AI analysis was 0.844 with 95% CI of [0.814; 0.869] for images of internal data heart slices. On external data heart slices, AI accurately annotated slice area and AAR but failed to annotate infarcted area. On internal whole-heart data, CCC between AI and AI-assisted IS/AAR was 0.894 with 95% CI of [0.812; 0.942]. AI-assisted analysis reduced evaluation time on both internal and external datasets and increased region overlap for AAR between the two independent evaluators on dependent data. ConclusionsAI-assisted analysis significantly reduced analysis time and inter-observer variability. For optimal performance, lab-specific AI training is recommended. Infarctsize-AI is available at https://infarctsize.com. Translational perspectiveMyocardial infarct size (IS) is the gold-standard end-point in shorth-term studies to assess potential cardioprotective therapies against acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, IS quantification in rodent AMI models is time-consuming and prone to inter-observer variance. Therefore, we developed an AI-based software that can reduce analysis time and inter-observer variability and facilitate documentation, which facilitates the clinical translation of potential cardioprotective therapies. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=34 SRC="FIGDIR/small/688527v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (15K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@187c938org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1ab8bb4org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@160dc68org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@264617_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.