Visualizing the Genetic Heterogeneity of Major Depressive Disorder using GDVIS
Thijssen, A. B.; Milaneschi, Y.; Bartels, M.; Penninx, B. W.; Pasman, J. A.; Verweij, K.; Peyrot, W. J.
Show abstract
Investigating the genetic heterogeneity of psychiatric disorders, such as Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), is a key area of research, aimed at increasing etiological insights and ultimately improving clinical outcomes via personalized treatment. Previous research has used genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to investigate genetic heterogeneity by analyzing disorder subtypes versus controls (e.g. depression with comorbid anxiety versus controls, and depression without comorbid anxiety versus controls). However, the most important comparison for disentangling subtypes is typically neglected: the direct comparison subtype1-cases versus subtype2-cases (e.g. depression with comorbid anxiety versus depression without comorbid anxiety). We hypothesize that the direct comparison is being disregarded because of the lack of a generalizable distance metric (as observed or liability scale heritability are not readily interpretable), and because the data for this comparison may be harder to collect. Here, we introduce a novel method, Genetic DIstance of disorder Subtypes (GDIS), which benchmarks the genetic distance between subtype1-cases and subtype2-cases, by computing genetic distances (as the square root of the heritability on the 50/50 ascertainment scale) and geometrical angles (the inverse cosine of the genetic correlation). GDIS is readily applicable as it requires only subtype versus control summary statistics, and no individual-level data or GWAS of the direct subtype comparison. First, using data from the UK Biobank, we extensively validate the GDIS-geometrical representation to benchmark subtype1-cases versus subtype2-cases. Second, we applied GDIS to seven subtype-definitions of MDD to estimate the genetic distance between subtypes, informing their potential for future prediction and clinical stratification. Third, we extended and applied GDIS to investigate which subtypes were differentially correlated with each of 15 external traits; important information that cannot be distilled from the usual subtype vs control comparisons. Finally, GDIS aids intuition of the genetic interrelatedness of the subtypes through geometric visualizations. In conclusion, GDIS is a novel tool to benchmark direct subtype comparisons, yielding new insights into genetic heterogeneity of MDD.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying loci with different allele frequencies among cases of eight psychiatric disorders using CC-GWAS 96%
- Polygenic profiles define aspects of clinical heterogeneity in ADHD 93%
- Differences in the genetic architecture of common and rare variants in childhood, persistent and late-diagnosed attention deficit hyperactivity disorder 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A comparison of ten polygenic score methods for psychiatric disorders applied across multiple cohorts 95%
- GWAS of Over 427,000 Individuals Establishes GABAergic and Synaptic Molecular Pathways as Key for Cognitive Executive Functions 93%
- Polygenic analyses show important differences between MDD symptoms collected using PHQ9 and CIDI-SF 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- TWAS pathway method greatly enhances the number of leads for uncovering the molecular underpinnings of psychiatric disorders 95%
- Schizophrenia Risk Alleles Often Affect The Expression of Many Genes and Each Gene May Have a Different Effect On The Risk; A Mediation Analysis. 93%
- Integrative multi-omics analysis of genomic, epigenomic, and metabolomics data leads to new insights for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Multivariate Genome-Wide Association Study Reveals Neural Correlates and Common Biological Mechanisms of Psychopathology Spectra 94%
- Evidence of shared genetic influences underlying schizophrenia and alcohol use disorder, but not alcohol consumption 94%
- Integrating HiTOP and RDoC Frameworks Part II: Shared and Distinct Biological Mechanisms of Externalizing and Internalizing Psychopathology 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Glycoprotein Acetyls and Depression: testing for directionality and potential causality using longitudinal data and Mendelian randomization analyses 92%
- Consistent Differential Effects of Bupropion and Mirtazapine in Major Depression 92%
- Individual Deviations from Normative Electroencephalographic Connectivity Predict Antidepressant Response 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.