A method for robust estimation of seasonal onset and intensity in respiratory surveillance data: evaluated using data from 21 European countries
Otero, S. M.; Telkamp, K. S.; Emborg, H.-D.; Moustsen-Helms, I. R.; Soeborg, B.; Christiansen, L. E.
Show abstract
BackgroundSeasonal respiratory pathogens cause hospital admissions and strain health services. Commonly used methods, Moving Epidemic Method (mem), WHO Average Curve Method (WHO-ACM) and Mean Standard Deviation method (MSD), support post-season intensity assessment. We developed aedseo for early seasonal onset detection and within-season intensity assessment. Methodsaedseo fits a rolling quasi-Poisson generalised linear model to weekly counts; onset is declared when growth is significant and the five-week mean exceeds a disease-specific threshold (Tdisease) estimated from recent seasons. Intensity breakpoints (between intensity levels; very low to very high) are disease-specific; Tdisease defines very low; high is the 97.5th percentile of a log-normal fitted to three highest weekly counts per season; low and medium are equally log-spaced in-between. aedseo was developed on Danish respiratory surveillance data and validated with 63 data sources (influenza, RSV, ARI, ILI) from 21 European countries (seasons 2014/15-2023/24), benchmarked against mem, WHO-ACM and MSD. Resultsaedseo signalled onset in 60/63 sources and mem crossed its epidemic threshold in 55/63. When both signalled, aedseo was earlier in 45. Median lead times (weeks) were 6.5 for influenza, 4.5 for RSV, 22 for ARI and 5.5 for ILI; growth between signals was usually sustained, particularly for influenza, RSV and ILI. aedseo provided more consistent intensity categorisation across seasons than mem, WHO-ACM and MSD. Conclusionaedseo excels in early onset detection and within-season intensity assessment. It has demonstrated robust performance in the Danish national respiratory surveillance system and across European data sources, supporting timely planning and communication within surveillance frameworks.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Interactions among common non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory viruses and influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on their circulation in New York City 94%
- Biases in routine influenza surveillance indicators used to monitor infection incidence and recommendations for improvement 94%
- Detection of novel influenza viruses through community and healthcare testing: Implications for surveillance efforts in the United States 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the epidemic reproduction number from temporally aggregated incidence data: a statistical modelling approach and software tool 94%
- Cluster detection with random neighbourhood covering: application to invasive Group A Streptococcal disease 94%
- Nowcasting by Bayesian Smoothing: A flexible, generalizable model for real-time epidemic tracking 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A simulation-based approach for estimating the time-dependent reproduction number from temporally aggregated disease incidence time series data 94%
- Cross-sectional cycle threshold values reflect epidemic dynamics of COVID-19 in Madagascar 93%
- Nowcasting and Forecasting the 2022 U.S. Mpox Outbreak: Support for Public Health Decision Making and Lessons Learned 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Early Detection of COVID-19 Outbreaks Using Human Mobility Data 93%
- Sorting out assortativity: when can we assess the contributions of different population groups to epidemic transmission? 93%
- A causal inference approach for estimating effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions during Covid-19 pandemic 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.