Recurrent Breast Cancer Cells Depend on De novo Pyrimidine Biosynthesis to Suppress Ferroptosis
McCutcheon, K. R.; Wu, J.; Ozdemir, Y. C.; McKinney, B. J.; Srinivasan, S.; Itokawa, A.; Newsom, O. J.; Vigil, A.; Fox, D. B.; Sullivan, L. B.; Alvarez, J. V.
Show abstract
Breast cancer recurrence remains a major clinical challenge, often associated with therapy resistance and altered metabolic states. To define metabolic vulnerabilities of recurrent disease, we performed a CRISPR knockout screen targeting 421 metabolic genes in paired primary and recurrent HER2-driven breast cancer cell lines. While both primary and recurrent tumors shared dependencies on core metabolic pathways, recurrent tumors exhibited selective essentiality for the de novo pyrimidine synthesis pathway, including Cad, Dhodh, and Ctps. Pharmacologic inhibition of the rate-limiting enzyme DHODH with BAY-2402234 selectively impaired the growth of recurrent tumor cells, while primary tumor cells were relatively resistant. BAY treatment robustly inhibited pyrimidine synthesis in all lines, but only recurrent cells underwent iron-dependent lipid peroxidation and ferroptotic cell death. Lipidomic profiling revealed enrichment of polyunsaturated ether phospholipids in recurrent cells, which may predispose them to ferroptosis. A sensitizer CRISPR screen in primary cells further identified nucleotide salvage and lipid metabolic pathways as modifiers of DHODH inhibitor sensitivity. Stable isotope tracing and nutrient depletion experiments showed that primary cells can compensate for DHODH inhibition through nucleotide salvage, whereas recurrent cells exhibit impaired salvage capacity, likely due to reduced expression of Slc28/Slc29 nucleoside transporters. Together, these findings reveal that breast cancer recurrence is associated with increased dependence on de novo pyrimidine synthesis to suppress ferroptosis, highlighting a therapeutically actionable metabolic vulnerability in recurrent disease.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- SOS1 and KSR1 modulate MEK inhibitor responsiveness to target resistant cell populations based on PI3K and KRAS mutation status 96%
- Adaptation of pancreatic cancer cells to nutrient deprivation is reversible and requires glutamine synthetase stabilization by mTORC1 96%
- CRISPR metabolic screen identifies ATM and KEAP1 as targetable genetic vulnerabilities in solid tumors. 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Targeting the dependence on PIK3C3-mTORC1 signaling in dormancy-prone breast cancer cells blunts metastasis initiation 97%
- NRF2 translation block by inhibition of cap-dependent initiation sensitizes lymphoma cells to ferroptosis and CAR-T immunotherapy 96%
- IGF targeting perturbs global replication through ribonucleotide reductase dysfunction 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ontogeny and Vulnerabilities of Drug-Tolerant Persisters in HER2+ Breast Cancer 97%
- Mitochondrial-encoded complex I impairment induces a targetable dependency on aerobic fermentation in Hürthle cell carcinoma of the thyroid 96%
- Alveolar differentiation drives resistance to KRAS inhibition in lung adenocarcinoma 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- G9a Promotes Breast Cancer Recurrence Through Repression of a Pro-inflammatory Program 96%
- Pharmacological depletion of RNA splicing factor RBM39 by indisulam synergizes with PARP inhibitors in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma 96%
- Exploiting the polypharmacology of alectinib for synergistic RNA splicing disruption with RBM39 degraders 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The CD73 immune checkpoint promotes tumor cell metabolic fitness 97%
- Combinatorial CRISPR screen reveals FYN and KDM4 as targets for synergistic drug combination for treating triple negative breast cancer 96%
- PCK1 and DHODH drive colorectal cancer liver metastatic colonization and nucleotide biosynthesis under hypoxia 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.