Back

Sex- and ketogenesis-dependent effects of intermittent fasting against diet-induced obesity and fatty liver disease

Aslani, T.; Asif, S.; Oh, Y.; Lee, H.; Stocker, C.; Kwon, S.; Pan, J.; Dababneh, S.; Zhao, X.; Taylor, L.; Mullick, A. E.; Tibbits, G. F.; Kim, R. Y.; Fullerton, M. D.; Mulvihill, E. E.; Son, J. E.; Kim, K.-H.

2025-11-18 physiology
10.1101/2025.11.17.688915 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ABSTRACTSIntermittent fasting (IF) improves metabolic health, yet the requirement for hepatic ketogenesis in mediating these benefits remains unclear. Here, we investigated how hepatic ketogenesis contributes to the metabolic and hepatic effects of IF in male and female mice. In the human liver, ketogenesis-associated genes showed sex-dependent correlations with inflammatory and fibrotic pathways. In mice, fasting increased circulating ketone bodies, with females exhibiting a greater rise, indicating intrinsic sex differences in ketone metabolism. IF reduced body weight and adiposity in both sexes, and these systemic benefits persisted despite antisense oligonucleotide (ASO)-mediated knockdown of hepatic Hmgcs2. In contrast, hepatic benefits were sex- and ketogenesis-dependent. IF markedly reduced steatosis and fibrosis in male mice, but these improvements were attenuated or abolished when hepatic ketogenesis was disrupted. Female mice showed minimal hepatic benefit from IF and displayed heightened susceptibility to steatosis, fibrosis, and inflammatory activation under ketogenic insufficiency. Single-cell transcriptomic analyses identified neutrophils and myofibroblasts as key responders to hepatocyte-derived ketone bodies, and IF suppressed neutrophil-driven inflammatory signaling in a ketogenesis-dependent manner in males but not females. Together, these findings demonstrate that while systemic metabolic improvements from IF are largely ketogenesis-independent, the hepatic anti-steatotic and anti-fibrotic effects of IF are sexually dimorphic and require intact hepatic ketogenesis.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.