Back

Effects of Short-Term Breathwork on Respiration and Cognition

Hehemann, L.; Stetza, L.; Kayser, C.

2025-11-17 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2025.11.17.688761 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Respiration is a unique physiological process that can operate automatically but can also be deliberately used to modulate the bodily state. Importantly, respiration is deeply intertwined with neural processes, influencing processes from arousal and attention to executive control. Although structured respiration (breathing practice) has been exploited for centuries, the immediate consequences of short periods of structured respiration for sensation and cognition remain poorly understood. The present study examined how brief, one-minute episodes of structured respiration affect respiration and performance in a subsequent sensory-cognitive task. Across two experiments, participants engaged in structured breathing practices manipulating either respiratory frequency (slow breathing vs. fast breathing) or the inhalation-exhalation ratio (short inspiration-long expiration; long inspiration-short expiration) prior to performing a visual emotion discrimination task. Immediately after breathing practice, participants respiration deviated from their baseline: each technique resulted in specific deviations of respiratory frequency, inhalation-exhalation ratio, or the occurrence of atypical respiratory cycles, suggesting technique-specific returns to regular respiration. During the subsequent emotion response accuracy or reaction times did not differ between breathing practices. However, we observed transient improvements in reaction times immediately following all practices, suggesting a brief facilitation of attentional or sensorimotor responsiveness following conscious breathing. Our findings indicate that even brief, consciously controlled respiration can transiently influence cognitive performance, highlighting the role of voluntary respiratory modulation in shaping brain function and behavior.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.