Back

Candling analysis of egg development in an endangered bird species Crested ibis (Nipponia nippon)

He, Y.; Xi, X.; Zeng, S.; Huang, H.; Zhan, X.; Wang, D.

2025-11-17 zoology
10.1101/2025.11.17.688759 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Identifying key factors influencing the survival of animals, particularly rare and endangered species is crucial to biodiversity conservation. In birds, hatching failure is pronounced in endangered species. Accurate assessment of egg development and the ability to distinguish non-viable eggs are essential prerequisites for identifying the causes of hatching failure and applying appropriate conservation practices. The Crested ibis (Nipponia nippon), a flagship endangered species, has a long history of captive breeding, which has contributed to population recovery. However, little is known about the specific process and characteristics of its egg development. In this study, we provided the first comprehensive description of normal egg development in the Crested ibis, including both the changes observed in unfertilized eggs during incubation and embryonic development via candling (n = 106 eggs, with 1,423 candling images), a commonly used non-invasive method for assessing egg fertility and embryonic status, and offered a practical reference for assessing fertilization status and embryo viability. In addition, we estimated the timing of embryo mortality and found that most deaths occurred during mid-incubation (Day 7[~]15) (n = 12, 60.0%) and shortly before hatching (Day 23[~]29) (n = 7, 35.0%), highlighting these critical periods that require particular attention. This species-specific documentation of egg development provides a valuable reference for accurately assessing embryonic progress, evaluating environmental effects on survival, and guiding adaptive management, benefiting both captive breeding programs and field conservation efforts.

Published in Ecology and Evolution · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.