A disease mutation reveals a non-swapped pore and rewired gating cycle of the mechanically activated PIEZO1 channel
Wang, C.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, X.; Liu, S.; Yuan, J.; Lin, C.; Zhang, X.; Tian, B.; Li, X.; Xiao, B.
Show abstract
PIEZO1 is a versatile mechanotranduction channel critical for diverse cellular and physiological processes1-3. Gain-of-function mutations, such as R2482H, which slow channel inactivation, are linked to dehydrated hereditary stomatocytosis (DHS) and iron overload4-7. PIEZO1 forms a gigantic bowl-shaped trimer comprising flattenable peripheral blades and a central pore module with a switchable cap8-12. However, the structural dynamics governing its gating process and pathogenesis remain incompletely understood. Here, we determined distinct conformational states of the DHS-associated PIEZO1-R2482H mutant in both detergents and proteoliposomes. Remarkably, the R2482H mutation in the central pore induces a conformational change that propagates [~]25 nm to the most distal blade, enabling resolution of all 38 transmembrane helices. PIEZO1-R2482H is inherently flatter than PIEZO1, lowering the gating force and energy barrier and thus explaining its heightened mechanosensitivity. While the flattened PIEZO1 has its cap in the up-state adopting an inactivated state, the flattened PIEZO1-R2482H has its cap in the down-state and twisted by [~]75{degrees}, drastically switching the pore module from a swapped to a non-swapped organization. Such twisted conformation of PIEZO1-R2482H might hinder the transition to the inactivated state, instead proceeding through a deactivation-transition state characterized by curved blades and a partially twisted cap, thereby accounting for the slowed inactivation and deactivation kinetics. Taken together, we reveal the full transmembrane topology and a non-swapped pore conformation induced by R2482H, and propose the structural dynamic model that delineates the distinct gating cycle of activation, inactivation, and deactivation for PIEZO1 and PIEZO1-R2482H.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.