Implementation of a Gait and Balance Battery of Outcome Measures in an Inpatient Rehabilitation Hospital
Ling, L.; Carson, R.; Olivier, G.; French, M. A.
Show abstract
ImportanceStandardized outcome measure (OM) batteries are important for tracking functional progress, enhancing communication among providers, and evaluating intervention effectiveness in physical therapy. However, implementation of standardized batteries is challenging due to time constraints, documentation requirements, and limited resources. ObjectiveTo evaluate implementation of a standardized gait and balance OM battery by physical therapists for patients with stroke, brain injury, and spinal cord injury in the inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) setting. DesignA retrospective cohort study of 773 episodes of care at the IRF, and a quantitative survey for 22 staff physical therapists at the IRF. SettingA 75-bed IRF in the United States. InterventionsA standardized OM battery with five measures was implemented by all physical therapy teams at the IRF. Main Outcomes and MeasuresWe assessed four implementation outcomes: Penetration and Sustainability, which we assessed with retrospective cohort data of episodes of care, and Acceptability and Feasibility, which we assessed with the quantitative survey of physical therapists. ResultsThe implementation effort resulted in a significant improvement in the completion rates of all five OMs, with most measures exceeding a 70% completion rate threshold within one year after implementation. Completion rates of the entire battery increased significantly with the implementation effort, though did not reach the goal 70% completion rate. Physical therapists indicated that implementation of the standardized OM battery resulted in positive practice changes, and that barriers to completion were patients functional levels and the time required for completion. ConclusionsImplementation of a standardized OM battery is feasible in the IRF setting, though OM completion rates may improve with a more condensed battery and with integration into clinical workflows. RelevanceThis study provides a practical model for IRFs to adopt and evaluate standardized OM batteries that improve our ability to assess physical function across health systems and settings.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Design of a Clinical Balance Tool for Fall Risk Assessments: A Development and Usability Study 95%
- Supervised and self-directed technology-based dual-task exercise training programme for older adults at risk of falling – Protocol for a feasibility study 94%
- The role of Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in pre-clinical spinal cord research: an interview study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Disparities in Access to, Use of, and Quality of Rehabilitation Care Following Stroke: A Scoping Review 93%
- Using remotely delivered Spring Forest Qigong™ to reduce neuropathic pain in adults with spinal cord injury: A non-randomized controlled trial 92%
- Quantifying Exercise Intensity to Predict Changes in Walking Capacity in People with Chronic Stroke 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- “It all ends too soon” - Exploring stroke survivors and physiotherapists perspectives on stroke rehabilitation and the role of technology for promoting access to rehabilitation in the community 93%
- Rest the Brain to Learn New Gait Patterns after Stroke 92%
- Overground robotic walker use in the home and community: a six-month prospective cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Physiotherapists’ use of aerobic exercise during stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative study using chart-stimulated recall 95%
- Development and content validation of a questionnaire identifying patients’ functional priorities and abilities after hip or knee arthroplasty 93%
- Cardiorespiratory exercise and self-management early after stroke to increase daily physical activity: results from a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.