Back

Discovering latent subtypes of preterm birth and genetic risk using tensor decomposition on electronic health records

Abraham, A.; Bejan, C.; Takasuka, H.; Sirota, M.; Capra, J. A.

2025-11-19 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2025.11.17.25340397 medRxiv
Show abstract

Preterm birth is a syndrome that is triggered by diverse biological pathways and presents with many comorbid diseases. Although twin studies reveal a substantial heritable component, the genetic mechanisms of preterm birth remain poorly understood. We hypothesize that refining the preterm birth phenotype will reveal sub-phenotypes associated with distinct genetic risk factors and potential treatments. Here, we leverage rich longitudinal data from electronic health records (EHRs) from over 60,000 individuals from two clinical sites. Using tensor decomposition, we uncover several latent factors (LFs) that capture coherent combinations of comorbidities (e.g., metabolic, inflammatory, and mental health) and temporal trajectories of preterm and term births. Similar LFs are discovered between the two sites, underscoring their interpretability. Machine learning models trained on LFs accurately predict preterm birth and perform comparably to models trained on the full EHR data. Integrating genome-wide genotyping for >2,200 individuals, we find robust associations of preterm birth risk with high polygenic burden for cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and body mass index. Using LFs, we discover that these genetic signals are strongly and specifically associated with different subsets of the preterm birth cohort. For example, the polygenic diabetes risk is associated with a LF characterized by relevant metabolic disorders. In summary, our study integrates latent phenotypes discovered from large EHR datasets with genetic data to predict preterm birth risk, uncover disease subtypes and comorbidities that drive genetic associations, and delineate the mechanisms underlying the heterogeneity of this complex trait.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.