Shared neural geometries for bilingual semantic representations in human hippocampal neurons
Yan, X.; Krishna, A.; Van Arsdel, K.; Gautam, I.; Kim, Y.; Shrivastava, A.; Belanger, J.; Chavez, A. G.; Chericoni, A.; Franch, M.; Ismail, T.; Katlowitz, K.; Mickiewicz, E.; Paulo, D.; Zhu, H.; Goldman, A. M.; Krishnan, V.; Maheshwari, A.; Bartoli, E.; Provenza, N.; Yoo, S. B. M.; Hayden, B. Y.; Sheth, S.
Show abstract
The human brain has the remarkable ability to comprehend and express similar concepts in multiple languages. To understand how it does so, we examined responses of hippocampal neurons during passive listening, directed speaking, and spontaneous conversation, in both English and Spanish, in a small group of balanced bilinguals. We find a small number of putative cross-language neurons, whose responses to equivalent words (e.g., "tierra" and "earth") are correlated. However, neurons semantic tunings differed substantially by language, suggesting language-specific neural implementations. Instead, the crucial driver of translation was a preserved geometric organization of neural responses between the two languages, one that did not depend on neuron level functional overlap. Indeed, that geometry was implemented by a common set of neurons along distinct readout axes; this difference in readout may help prevent cross-language interference. Together, these results suggest that hippocampus encodes a language-independent internal model for meaning.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Topography of speech-related acoustic and phonological feature encoding throughout the human core and parabelt auditory cortex 94%
- The geometry of the representation of decision variable and stimulus difficulty in the parietal cortex 94%
- Human hippocampal CA3 uses specific functional connectivity rules for efficient associative memory 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.