Back

ProMPt: A modular preclinical platform for functional modelling of prostate cancer heterogeneity and therapeutic vulnerabilities

Pandell, N.; Househam, J.; Tartagni, M.; Thankamony, A.; Gabel, F.; Rota, R.; Flittner, E.; Gurel, B.; Figueiredo, I.; Seed, G.; Neeb, A. J.; Chol, M.; Yuan, W.; Clohessy, J. G.; Tape, C. J.; Sharp, A.; de Bono, J. S.; Bezzi, M.

2025-11-16 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.11.16.688689 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Prostate cancer progression is driven by heterogenous genetic, phenotypic, and microenvironmental programs that remain challenging to model experimentally. Existing systems such as genetically engineered mouse models, xenografts, and patient-derived organoids have each advanced mechanistic insight but are limited by genetic scope, scalability, or lack of immune context. To overcome these constraints we developed ProMPt, a genetically-defined syngeneic mouse modelling platform that captures combinations of the most recurrent clinical prostate cancer genomic alterations to enable scalable in vitro and in vivo interrogation of prostate cancer evolution. Tumours derived from ProMPt organoids recapitulate the histologic and molecular diversity of human disease. Cross - species transcriptomic integration and multivariate single-cell analysis under defined culture permutations revealed conserved phenoscapes, highlighting a central role for MYC in disease progression and therapy resistance. Guided by these insights, preclinical intervention studies demonstrated that combined MAPK inhibition and blockade of protein translation synergistically suppressed tumour growth in castration-resistant models. This combination not only suppressed proliferation but also remodelled the tumour immune landscape, underscoring its dual epithelial and microenvironmental effects. Together, these findings establish ProMPt as a versatile framework for linking genotype, lineage plasticity, and therapeutic vulnerability in prostate cancer.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.