Back

Circulating biomarkers of bronchoalveolar injury help predict the need for mechanical ventilation in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 pneumonia: a prospective cohort study

Allardet-Servent, J.; Hezard, N.; Pissier, C.; Bardin, N.; Cohen, F.; Dehaene, A.; Soundaravelou, R.; Halfon, P.; Loundou, A. D.; Alessi, M.-C.; Morange, P.-E.

2025-11-18 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2025.11.16.25340358 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSevere respiratory failure is a major complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and the need for mechanical ventilation (MV) is associated with a worse outcome. Whether some soluble biomarkers of lung injury can help predict MV requirement remains unclear. MethodsThis prospective, observational, monocentric cohort study consecutively enrolled patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia within 48 h of hospital admission. The serum concentrations of five key bronchoalveolar epithelial and endothelial biomarkers were determined at Day 0, 7 and 14: Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6); soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products (sRAGE); club cell protein 16 (CC16); angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2); and soluble CD146 (sCD146). The respiratory severity of COVID-19 pneumonia was defined by the maximal level of respiratory support received during hospitalization: oxygen (by mask or nasal prong); high flow oxygen therapy (HFOT); and MV. End-points were the need for MV during hospitalization and the time to liberation from oxygen. ResultsFifty-four COVID-19 patients were enrolled; 23 (43%) required MV, 13 (24%) HFOT, and 18 (33%) oxygen. At inclusion, levels of KL-6, sRAGE, and CC16 were significantly higher in MV compared with non-MV patients (p < 0.05), with sRAGE showing the greatest difference (2.4-fold increase). In multivariate logistic regression, sRAGE (OR per 100 pg/mL increase, 1.028 [95% CI, 1.004-1.054]; p = 0.022) and SpO2/FIO2 (OR, 0.984 [95% CI, 0.970-0.998]; p = 0.008) were identified as independent risk factors for MV. Furthermore, patients with an sRAGE [&ge;] 5449 pg/mL at inclusion had a lower probability of weaning from oxygen at Day 60 (HR, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.19-0.67]; p = 0.001). From Day 7 to Day 14, CC16 levels increased while sCD146 levels decreased in MV patients. ConclusionAmong five circulating biomarkers of bronchoalveolar injury, sRAGE showed the most favorable kinetic profile, rapidly increasing in MV patients. The early measurement of sRAGE and SpO2/FIO2 upon hospital admission may effectively identify COVID-19 patients at high risk of requiring MV and prolonged oxygen support.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.6%
3
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.1%
5
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.5%
6
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
7
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
8
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
9
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.5%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
11
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
12
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
Pediatric Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
14
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
15
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
17
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
18
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
19
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
20
Clinical Immunology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
22
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
23
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%