A single large restored patch has lower tree diversity than several smaller ones
GALAN ACEDO, C.; Riva, F.; Fahrig, L.; Holscher, D.; Martin, A. E.
Show abstract
1. Restoration initiatives often target restoring the largest possible amount of habitat to provide the greatest benefits for biodiversity. However, the optimal configuration (e.g., the size and number of restored patches) of habitat, given a fixed total area, remains an unresolved question. 2. Here, we ask whether restoring a single large habitat patch or a mixture of smaller patches of the same total area supports higher plant diversity. To address this question, we measured taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional diversity of all naturally recruiting woody species in 52 restored vegetation patches in Jambi Province, Sumatra, Indonesia. Thirteen restored patches of each of four sizes (25, 100, 400, and 1,600 m{superscript 2}) were established within conventional oil palm plantations six years before vegetation sampling. From these 52 patches, we generated 750 random comparisons between a single large patch vs. several small patches, ensuring equal total area (100, 400, or 1,600 m{superscript 2}). We evaluated taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional diversity separately for all species, for native species, and for native forest species, using three diversity measures: species richness, the exponential of Shannon entropy, and the inverse of Simpson concentration. 3. Our findings indicate that restoring several smaller patches results in greater taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional diversity of recruiting woody species than restoring a single large patch of the same total area. This result holds across the three total habitat areas (100, 400, and 1,600 m{superscript 2}), all species groupings, and all diversity metrics. As expected, species diversity also increased with total area in all cases. 4. Our findings challenge restoration strategies that focus exclusively on enlarging patches. Instead, biodiversity will be enhanced by increasing the total restored area across many patches of different sizes, including very small ones (e.g., 25 m{superscript 2}).
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- From taxonomic to functional dark diversity: exploring the causes of potential biodiversity and its implications for conservation 96%
- Using generalised dissimilarity modelling and targeted field surveys to gap-fill an ecosystem surveillance network 94%
- Habitat restoration and the recovery of metacommunities 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sticking around: plant persistence strategies on edaphic islands 94%
- Metrics for conservation success: using the 'Bird-Friendliness Index' to evaluate grassland and aridland bird community resilience across the Northern Great Plains ecosystem 93%
- Identifying conservation priorities in a defaunated tropical biodiversity hotspot 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Partitioning the colonization and extinction components of beta diversity: Spatiotemporal species turnover across disturbance gradients 96%
- Tree demographic strategies largely overlap across succession in Neotropical wet and dry forest communities 95%
- Historical forest disturbance results in variation in functional resilience of seed dispersal mutualisms 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The recovery of plant community composition following passive restoration across spatial scales 96%
- Vegetation structural complexity uniquely captures competition between vascular plants and bryophytes over succession 95%
- Long-term cross-scale comparison of grazing and mowing on plant diversity and community composition in a salt-marsh system 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Defining endemism levels for biodiversity conservation: tree species in the Atlantic Forest hotspot 93%
- An expert-based global assessment of threats and conservation measures for subterranean ecosystems 92%
- Spatial conservation planning of forest genetic resources in a Mediterranean multi-refugial area 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.