Back

A Multi-Omic Atlas of Convergent and Divergent Metabolic Regulatory Circuitries in Cancer

Almeida Cordeiro Nogueira, H.; Rodrigues de Souza, E.; dos Santos Lopes, V.; Medina-Acosta, E.

2025-11-17 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.11.15.688631 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Metabolic reprogramming underlies tumor progression, immune evasion, and resistance to regulated cell death, yet the higher-order regulatory logic that coordinates these processes across molecular layers remains poorly defined. We developed OncoMetabolismGPS, a multi-omic analytical framework that reconstructs a Pan-Cancer atlas of convergent and divergent metabolic regulatory circuitries. From 463,433 significant multi-omic and phenotypic associations across 33 tumor types, we derived 241,415 omic-specific metabolic signatures, each integrating metabolic pathway context with phenotypic, prognostic, and immune features. By mapping shared upstream regulators of these signatures, we identified 24,796 metabolic regulatory circuitries--classified as convergent when regulators and signatures act in the same biological direction, or divergent when they exhibit opposing associations. Divergent circuitry predominated, especially in immunosuppressive (cold) tumor contexts, revealing context-dependent regulatory compensation across metabolic, phenotypic, and clinical axes. The accompanying OncoMetabolismGPS Shiny application implements this atlas as an interactive platform that positions each signature and circuitry within a multidimensional coordinate space defined by molecular, phenotypic, immune, and clinical attributes, enabling systematic navigation of metabolic regulatory behavior in cancer. Together, this study establishes the first multi-omic atlas of metabolic regulatory circuitries, providing a conceptual and computational framework for dissecting metabolic plasticity, pathway dependencies, and therapeutic vulnerabilities across human cancers.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.