A Multi-Omic Atlas of Convergent and Divergent Metabolic Regulatory Circuitries in Cancer
Almeida Cordeiro Nogueira, H.; Rodrigues de Souza, E.; dos Santos Lopes, V.; Medina-Acosta, E.
Show abstract
Metabolic reprogramming underlies tumor progression, immune evasion, and resistance to regulated cell death, yet the higher-order regulatory logic that coordinates these processes across molecular layers remains poorly defined. We developed OncoMetabolismGPS, a multi-omic analytical framework that reconstructs a Pan-Cancer atlas of convergent and divergent metabolic regulatory circuitries. From 463,433 significant multi-omic and phenotypic associations across 33 tumor types, we derived 241,415 omic-specific metabolic signatures, each integrating metabolic pathway context with phenotypic, prognostic, and immune features. By mapping shared upstream regulators of these signatures, we identified 24,796 metabolic regulatory circuitries--classified as convergent when regulators and signatures act in the same biological direction, or divergent when they exhibit opposing associations. Divergent circuitry predominated, especially in immunosuppressive (cold) tumor contexts, revealing context-dependent regulatory compensation across metabolic, phenotypic, and clinical axes. The accompanying OncoMetabolismGPS Shiny application implements this atlas as an interactive platform that positions each signature and circuitry within a multidimensional coordinate space defined by molecular, phenotypic, immune, and clinical attributes, enabling systematic navigation of metabolic regulatory behavior in cancer. Together, this study establishes the first multi-omic atlas of metabolic regulatory circuitries, providing a conceptual and computational framework for dissecting metabolic plasticity, pathway dependencies, and therapeutic vulnerabilities across human cancers.
Matching journals
The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinct stress-dependent signatures of cellular and extracellular tRNA-derived small RNAs (tDRs) 92%
- Cancer-like fragmentomic characteristics of somatic variants in cell-free DNA 92%
- Controlling pericellular oxygen tension in cell culture reveals distinct breast cancer responses to low oxygen tensions 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrative spatial omics reveals distinct tumor-promoting multicellular niches and immunosuppressive mechanisms in Black American and White American patients with TNBC 94%
- Dissecting tumor cell programs through group biology estimation in clinical single-cell transcriptomics 94%
- Predicting immunotherapy response in advanced bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of six independent cohorts 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- SiRCle (Signature Regulatory Clustering) model integration reveals mechanisms of phenotype regulation in renal cancer 94%
- Pan-cancer identification of clinically relevant genomic subtypes using outcome-weighted integrative clustering 94%
- Spatial transcriptomic analysis of Sonic Hedgehog Medulloblastoma identifies that the loss of heterogeneity and promotion of differentiation underlies the response to CDK4/6 inhibition 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Epigenetic alterations at distal enhancers are linked to proliferation in human breast cancer 93%
- Gene essentiality in cancer is better predicted by mRNA abundance than by gene regulatory network-inferred activity 92%
- The Limits of Molecular Signatures for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Subtyping 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-cell Transcriptome Profiling of Post-treatment and Treatment-naive Colorectal Cancer: Insights into Putative Mechanisms of Chemoresistance 94%
- Tumor-associated macrophages confer resistance to chemotherapy (Trifluridine/Tipiracil) in digestive cancers by overexpressing Thymidine Phosphorylase 93%
- Integrative analysis of patient-derived tumoroids and ex vivo organoid modeling of ARID1A loss in bladder cancer reveals therapeutic molecular targets 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.