Back

Reduced-order modeling of solute transport within physiologically realistic solid tumor microenvironment

Akash, M. M. H.; Yeasin, M.; Mahmoudirad, S.; Niloy, R. A.; Mohammad, J.; Reindl, K.; Pandey, A.; Basu, S.

2025-11-17 physiology
10.1101/2025.11.15.688588 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWSolid tumors are characterized by densely packed extracellular matrices and limited vascularization, creating significant resistance to both diffusive and convective transport. In this study, we developed an integration of numerical computations with a theoretical modeling framework that couples three phase viscous-laminar transient simulations of glycocalyx-patched tumor vessel resolving plasma, red blood cells (RBCs), and white blood cells (WBCs) and tracking their volume fractions to a calibrated reverse advection-diffusion (RAD) model for intratumoral plasma transport. The reduced-order tumor microenvironment model uses histology-informed extracellular matrix (ECM) tumor domain and packing fraction, together with explicit glycocalyx-patch electrohydrodynamics (EHD) at the tumor vessel wall. At the fenestra, EHD increases inlet plasma intensity relative to a non-EHD framework across all models (means: 0.576 non-EHD vs 0.722 EHD; gain 25.34%). Numerical simulations of plasma perfusion in both the tumor ECM domain and a microfluidic benchmark exhibit two-stage kinetics, with an initial advection-dominated regime. The RAD model reproduces this behavior and, after a simple temporal calibration to account for pore-scale hydrodynamic acceleration resolved by computational fluid dynamics (CFD), matches the observed propagation. By using fully resolved, EHD-inclusive multiphase CFD simulations to calibrate a reduced-order RAD model parameterized by measurable geometric features, we bridge the gap between classical Darcy-Starling tissue perfusion models and fully resolved CFD. The resulting framework provides a tractable, mechanism-grounded tool for quantifying plasma progression in dense solid tumors.

Published in Frontiers in Pharmacology · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 1%
19.0%
2
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 12%
8.1%
4
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.7%
5
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.7%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
8
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
9
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.0%
11
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.8%
12
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
15
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
17
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
18
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Acta Biomaterialia
92 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.1%
21
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.9%
24
Molecular Biology of the Cell
311 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Mathematics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
26
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
27
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%