Predicting stress response trajectories: Differential contributions of limbic and prefrontal regions to cortisol and affective responses
Lipka, R.; Baertl, C.; Kreuzpointner, L.; Giglberger, M.; Konzok, J.; Speicher, N.; Waller, L.; Kudielka, B. M.; Wuest, S.; Walter, H.; Henze, G.-I.
Show abstract
Why do individuals respond differently to stress? Since rodent studies indicated that stress regulation relies on limbic and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) outputs, we aimed to investigate whether data from these regions could also predict cortisol and affect trajectories following psychosocial stress in humans. In this pre-registered study, 281 healthy adults (145 female) were exposed to ScanSTRESS. Repeated assessments of salivary cortisol and negative affect were used to identify response trajectories (i.e. groups of participants) using latent class mixture modelling (LCMM). LCMMs without brain predictors were compared to LCMMs including structural (volume, thickness) and functional (activation, exposure-time effect) predictors from the amygdala, hippocampus, or mPFC regions. Results showed that cortisol LCMMs without brain predictors exhibited a single mean trajectory. Adding brain predictors resulted in three to four response trajectories, depending on region and outcome. Within identified models, cortisol hyper-response trajectories were predicted by larger amygdala and hippocampus volumes. Cortisol non-responses were predicted by greater amygdala activation and volume. Elevated baseline cortisol was predicted by higher hippocampal activation. mPFC markers did not predict cortisol trajectories, however, medial orbitofrontal cortex parameters identified affect response profiles mirroring trait-like affect. Together, our findings suggest dissociated roles of limbic and mPFC regions in stress regulation: While limbic structures predicted cortisol responses, the mPFC shaped affective experience.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Effects of Stress Across the Lifespan on the Brain, Cognition and Mental Health: A UK Biobank study 94%
- Juvenile exposure to acute traumatic stress leads to long-lasting alterations in grey matter myelination in adult female but not male rats 93%
- Gestational stress decreases postpartum mitochondrial respiration in the prefrontal cortex of female rats 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neurostructural associations with traumatic experiences during child- and adulthood 95%
- Novel polygenic risk score as a translational tool linking depression-related changes in the corticolimbic transcriptome with neural face processing and anhedonic symptoms 94%
- Neural Correlates of Positive and Negative Valence System Dysfunction in Adolescents Revealed by Data-Driven Parcellation and Resting-State Network Modeling 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Chronic Psychosocial Stress and Experimental Pubertal Delay Affect Socioemotional Behavior and Amygdala Functional Connectivity in Adolescent Female Rhesus Macaques 93%
- Effects of acute psychological stress on blood cell-free mitochondrial DNA (cf-mtDNA): A crossover experimental study 93%
- Effects of sex hormones on brain GABA and glutamate levels in a cis- and transgender cohort 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Brain-based predictions of psychiatric illness-linked behaviors across the sexes 93%
- Great Expectations: A Critical Review of and Recommendations for the study of Reward Processing as a Cause and Predictor of Depression 92%
- Brain-Wide Mendelian Randomization Study of Anxiety Disorders and Symptoms 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Altered physiological, affective, and functional connectivity responses to acute stress in patients with alcohol use disorder 96%
- Sex-specific effects of early life unpredictability on hippocampal and amygdala responses to novelty in adolescents 95%
- Ketamine improves anhedonic phenotypes across species: Translational evidence from the Probabilistic Reward Task 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.