Back

Defining and detecting global transcriptional amplitude in circadian gene expression

Saint-Antoine, M. M.; Anafi, R.

2025-11-16 cell biology
10.1101/2025.11.14.688559 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Many genes exhibit circadian rhythms in expression. The amplitude of oscillation, both in core clock and circadian output genes, may differ from person to person. Mutations in core clock genes are known to alter global rhythmic properties, and researchers often informally discuss "circadian amplitude." Yet, it remains unclear whether, in the general population, differences in transcriptional amplitude are largely gene-specific, or if they reflect a global, transcriptome-wide pattern -- whether some individuals have globally higher or lower amplitude across the set of all rhythmic genes. We used Cosinor regression to reanalyze four human skin time-series transcriptomic datasets (paired epidermis/dermis samples, N=11, N=19) and found that, using either absolute or relative amplitude measures, distributions of gene amplitudes tended to cluster by subject. Using a non-parametric, permutation-based statistical test, we found that in many subjects this global amplitude trend was statistically significant (p [≤] 0.01). Furthermore, we found that when rhythmic genes were divided into two sets based on peak time (genes peaking before-noon and after-noon), the subjects global amplitude in one set predicted global amplitude in the other set (p [≤] 0.05). We also found that in the paired epidermis/dermis datasets, subjects global amplitude in epidermis predicted their global amplitude in the dermis (p [≤] 0.05). After identifying these trends in the skin datasets, we then found that evidence for subject-specific transcriptional rhythm strength replicated across 6 additional human time-course datasets from adipose, muscle, and blood. Perhaps surprisingly, across datasets, we found that neither established metrics of core clock transcriptional organization nor the amplitude of core clock transcription were strongly correlated with subject-specific global amplitude.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Biological Rhythms
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
42.2%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 10%
7.6%
3
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.7%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.2%
6
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.5%
7
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.8%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.6%
10
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.6%
11
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.4%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.4%
13
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.0%
14
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
15
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
16
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
17
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
18
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
24
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
25
The FEBS Journal
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
28
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%