Back

Efficient Bayesian Phylogenetics under the Infinite Sites Model

Specht, I.; Palacios, J. A.

2025-11-16 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.11.14.688551 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bayesian phylogenetic inference from molecular sequences can provide key insights into the evolutionary history of populations. Existing tools, however, often scale poorly with sample size. We present inPhynite, a highly-efficient Bayesian phylogenetics algorithm for genomic datasets compatible with the infinite sites mutation model. A key advantage of this model is that likelihood calculation, which typically incurs a substantial computational cost, becomes trivial. We show that under the infinite sites assumption, it is possible to sample a coarse space of mutations and coalescences from which we may recover complete phylogenetic trees. We design an efficient Markov chain for this space together with effective population size trajectories, modeled as piecewise constant functions. Based on real and synthetic data, our method significantly outperforms competing methods, offering a speedup of over 225 times in statistical efficiency on large datasets without incurring any loss in accuracy. Finally, we demonstrate how inPhynite can help us understand the evolutionary history and past effective population sizes of human populations based on mitochondrial DNA. SummaryInferring the phylogenetic tree and evolutionary parameters from a sample of molecular sequences plays a key role in the study of how populations evolve over time. Existing inference algorithms face major computational challenges due to the large size of the phylogenetic tree space and high cost of phylogenetic likelihood evaluation. We show that under the infinite sites model of mutations, it is possible to overcome these limitations by instead conducting inference over an ordered sequence of genotypes that encodes the essential information in the tree. This approach achieves superior statistical efficiency compared to existing methods under a range of evolutionary conditions.

Published in GENETICS (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.