Back

TraN variants mediate conjugation species specificity of IncA/C, IncH and Acinetobacter baumannii plasmids

He, S.; David, S.; Rattle, J.; Sanchez-Garrido, J.; Wong, J. L. C.; Beis, K.; Frankel, G.

2025-11-15 microbiology
10.1101/2025.11.14.688549 bioRxiv
Show abstract

IncA/C and IncH plasmids commonly carry antimicrobial resistance genes, notably blaNDM-1. Although these plasmids disseminate among Gram-negative pathogens via conjugation, the mechanisms underlying mating pair stabilisation (MPS) and conjugation species specificity remain poorly understood. In IncF plasmids, MPS is mediated by interactions between outer membrane proteins (OMP) encoded by the plasmids in the donor (TraN) and by the chromosome in the recipient. Using the Plascad database, we extracted 1,436 TraN sequences: 62.5% (898/1,436), mainly in IncF plasmids, are 550-660aa (we renamed TraN short, TraNS); 15% (216/1,436), in IncA/C plasmids, are 880-950aa (TraN medium, TraNM); and 11% (160/1,436), in IncH plasmids, are 1,050-1,070aa (TraN long, TraNL). A group of six TraN from Acinetobacter baumannii plasmids (891aa) were designated TraN V-shaped (TraNV). Like TraNS, TraNM and TraNL contain base and distal tip domains essential for conjugation, whereas TraNV has a base and two distinct tip domains forming a V-shaped structure. TraNM, TraNL and TraNV determine conjugation species specificity, with TraNL cooperating with OmpA. Tip swapping reverses conjugation specificity, revealing how TraNM and TraNL diversity influence plasmid host range and AMR dissemination. Our new data reveal the molecular basis of plasmid host specificity and broaden our understanding of how conjugation drives the dissemination of antimicrobial resistance genes among clinically relevant bacteria.

Published in Journal of Bacteriology (predicted rank #8) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.