Localized control of protein phase separation via membrane binding
LuValle-Burke, I.; Bartolucci, G.; Sun, D.; Zhao, X.; Weber, C. A.; Honigmann, A.
Show abstract
Phase separation of protein-rich condensates is key for the spatial organization of cells. Multivalent proteins can phase separate in the bulk cytoplasm to form 3D condensates or at the membrane surface to form 2D condensates. How cells control 2D versus 3D phase transitions is not well understood. Here, we combine an in vitro model system of membrane surface phase separation with thermodynamic modelling to explore the relation of 2D and 3D phase transitions. We engineered the phase-separating protein FUS to bind to membranes and quantified 2D and 3D phase separation as a function of total FUS concentration and salt concentration. We find that membrane binding induces the formation of 2D surface condensates far below the bulk saturation concentration. In addition to direct FUS-membrane binding, surface condensates sequester more FUS molecules from the bulk via protein-protein interactions, resulting in a substantial deviation from the classical binding isotherm. By changing the protein-protein interaction strength via salt titration, we find that the saturation concentrations for 2D and 3D phase separation are coupled. By extending the classical theory of condensate wetting via membrane binding, we recapitulate the experimental results and show that tuning the membrane-binding strength of a phase-separating protein provides a robust way to control 2D condensation at the membrane over a wide concentration range without entering the 3D condensation regime. Taken together, our results provide a simple framework to understand how cells tune protein interactions and membrane binding to control 2D and 3D phase transitions.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Wetting and complex remodeling of membranes by biomolecular condensates 97%
- Lateral compression of lipids drives transbilayer coupling of liquid-like protein condensates 97%
- Multivalent Interactions between Molecular Components Involved in Fast Endophilin Mediated Endocytosis Drive Protein Phase Separation 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- The conical shape of DIM lipids promotes Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection of macrophages 96%
- Identifying Sequence Perturbations to an Intrinsically Disordered Protein that Determine Its Phase Separation Behavior 95%
- The molecular mechanism of lipid uptake by membrane-anchored bridge-like lipid transfer proteins. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dimerization of a membrane transporter is driven by differential energetics of lipid solvation of dissociated and associated states 95%
- Biological condensates form percolated networks with molecular motion properties distinctly different from dilute solutions 94%
- Sublytic gasdermin-D pores captured in atomistic molecular simulations 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- How cell penetrating peptides behave differently from pore forming peptides: structure and stability of induced transmembrane pores 96%
- A Tug of War Between Condensate Phases in a Minimal Macromolecular System 95%
- Strikingly different roles of SARS-CoV-2 fusion peptides uncovered by neutron scattering 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.