Back

Social Information Quality and Environmental Volatility Shape Collective Foraging Behavior

Chirkov, V.; Kurvers, R. H. J. M.; Deffner, D.; Romanczuk, P.

2026-03-05 biophysics
10.1101/2025.11.14.688412 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Collective foraging is widespread across the animal kingdom, allowing animals to more effectively discover resources. However, collective foragers need to balance a key trade off between private exploration and using social information. Social information can come in very distinct forms, ranging from simple positional cues to complex payoff information. However, how the types of available social cues and environmental volatility shape collective foraging behavior is not well understood. We address this using a spatially-explicit model in which agents track a mobile resource via multi-agent reinforcement learning. Agents choose between random exploration, private tracking, and social attraction. We systematically varied resource volatility and the type of available social cues to analyze their effect on individual and collective behavior. Our results show that the quality of social information dictates the emerging collective behavior. Low-quality social cues (e.g., positions, actions) result in a fragile strategy that is effective in stable environments but fails as volatility increases. Conversely, high-quality social information (e.g., payoffs) enables behavioral diversity: Agents selectively copy others and flexibly change between individual tracking or exploration depending on the environmental volatility. Our findings identify the interplay between information quality and ecological context as a fundamental mechanism governing the emergence of distinct forms of collective behavior from individual decision rules.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
22.6%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.2%
3
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.4%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.8%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
7
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
9
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
10
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
Integrative And Comparative Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
15
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
16
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
17
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
18
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
19
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
20
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
24
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
25
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
26
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
27
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
28
Journal of the Royal Society Interface
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
29
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
30
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%