Back

Fisher-Rao distance and sex differences in disease prevalence trajectories

Rodriguez Caballero, J. M.

2025-11-17 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.11.14.25340249 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesWe introduce a new application of the Fisher-Rao geodesic distance to quantify sex differences in age-stratified chronic-disease prevalence trajectories, modelling those trajectories as dynami-cal systems on the hyperbolic plane and using GBD 2021 data. MethodsWe analysed prevalence for 10 major chronic conditions across three regions--US states (50 states + DC), 24 Western European countries, and 47 Japanese prefectures--over 1990-2019. We logit-transformed prevalence and summarised each age-sex cohort by normal-approximation parameters ({micro}, {sigma}), which were then embedded in the hyperbolic plane. Sex differences were quantified as the difference between the total Fisher-Rao trajectory lengths for males and females. We assessed cross-regional consistency using parametric (mean differences) and nonparametric (Cohens g) summaries, and compared Fisher-Rao results to KL divergence, absolute mean differences, and absolute SD differences. Study designCross-sectional analysis of GBD 2021 prevalence data modelled as trajectories in the hyperbolic plane. ResultsThe Fisher-Rao distance showed greater cross-regional consistency than the alternative metrics. Males showed greater trajectory shifts in neoplasms, cardiovascular diseases, chronic respiratory diseases, diabetes/kidney diseases, skin/subcutaneous diseases, and sense organ diseases. Females showed greater shifts in neurological disorders, mental disorders, and substance use disorders. Digestive diseases exhibited mixed patterns. ConclusionsThis geometry-informed metric outperforms alternatives in assessing sex disparities in disease burdens, enhancing public health surveillance and equity in chronic disease management. Future extensions should incorporate gender dimensions.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.