Back

Unified multimodal learning enables generalized cellular response prediction to diverse perturbations

Li, C.; Wei, L.; Zhang, X.

2026-01-24 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.11.13.688367 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cells respond to diverse external interventions through shared regulatory mechanisms, suggesting that diverse interventions may be amenable to unified computational modeling. In practice, however, these responses are profiled across highly heterogeneous experimental settings, including distinct perturbation modalities, dosages, combinations, and cellular contexts. As a result, most computational models remain narrowly tailored to a single perturbation modality or experimental setting. They are difficult to extend to new cell types or perturbation types for which limited training data are available, and offer limited capacity to reuse information across heterogeneous perturbation datasets. Here, we introduce X-Pert, a general perturbation modeling framework that jointly represents external interventions and cellular contexts within a unified multimodal architecture. X-Pert adopts a mechanism-aligned design that explicitly models gene-perturbation interactions together with gene-gene dependencies through dedicated attention mechanisms, enabling the unified handling of heterogeneous experimental settings. Across benchmarks involving both genetic and chemical perturbations, X-Pert consistently outperforms existing methods under conventional accuracy metrics as well as biology-aware evaluations. Importantly, X-Pert exhibits strong generalization across cell types and supports joint learning across perturbation types. The unified latent space learned by X-Pert further enables downstream analyses such as perturbation retrieval and drug-gene association discovery, facilitating the prioritization of candidate gene inhibitors and the identification of anti-cancer compounds. Together, X-Pert establishes a versatile and generalizable foundation for perturbation modeling and predictive virtual cells, with broad applications in biomedical research and therapeutic discovery.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.