Physiological and Perceptual Responses Across Menstrual Cycle Phases in Female Ultra-Endurance Athletes: A Pilot Study
Molina-Gonzalez, I.; Gray, S. R.
Show abstract
Ultra-endurance places considerable physiological stress on the body, and understanding how hormonal fluctuations affect women, who take part in ultra endurance training and events, could improve both safety and performance. The aim of this pilot study was to explore physiological and perceptual responses across MC phases in trained female ultra-endurance athletes. MethodsNaturally menstruating participants (VO2max: 51.4 {+/-} 5.7 mL{middle dot}kg-{superscript 1}{middle dot}min-{superscript 1}; ultramarathon experience: 2.6 {+/-} 1.1 years) were recruited. Seven completed a questionnaire on past experiences and performance perceptions related to the MC. Six underwent physiological testing in the early follicular (EFP), late follicular (LFP), and mid-luteal (MLP) phases. Assessments included resting metabolic rate (RMR), heart rate variability (HRV), and an incremental treadmill test for submaximal and maximal performance. Phase-specific questionnaires recorded perceived performance and well-being. ResultsMore than half of participants (57.1%) reported perceived performance decrements in the days preceding and during menstruation. However, no significant differences were found in submaximal (heart rate, running economy, rate of perceived exertion) or maximal (VO2max, peak velocity, time to exhaustion) physiological markers across MC phases. Respiratory frequency at LT1 showed a significant main effect of phase (p = 0.045), though pairwise comparisons did not reach significance. Resting variables, including HRV and RMR, or well-being markers, did not vary significantly between phases. ConclusionsPhysiological performance remained stable across MC phases, though trends suggested improved ventilatory efficiency in the LFP compared to the MLP during submaximal work. Despite the small sample size, the frequent reporting of MC-related symptoms indicates the importance of personalised MC monitoring. These findings highlight the practicability of integrating both objective and perceptual measurements in ultra-endurance research and support further investigation with larger cohorts.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal changes in anthropometric, physiological, and physical qualities of international women’s rugby league players 95%
- Heavy Resistance Exercise Training in Older Men: A Responder and Inter-individual Variability Analysis 94%
- Area per player in small-sided games to replicate the external load and estimated physiological match demands in elite soccer players 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Early morning run-training results in enhanced endurance performance adaptations in mice. 95%
- T-cell responses to acute cardiorespiratory or resistance exercise in cohorts of physically active or physically inactive older adults: A randomized complete crossover 95%
- Technological advances in elite marathon performance 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of Muscle Strength to Body Composition Measures using DXA, D 3 Cr, and BIA in Collegiate Athletes 93%
- Joint contact forces during barefoot, minimal and conventional shod running are highly individual 93%
- Total testosterone is not associated with lean mass or handgrip strength in pre-menopausal females: findings from the NHANES 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of oral contraceptive consumption timing on substrate metabolism, cognition, and exercise performance in females: a randomised controlled trial 94%
- RACLET: the Ramp Above Critical Level Endurance Test to evaluate critical velocity in running. 93%
- A single decreasing ramp friction sprint for torque-cadence relationship assessment during cycling 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.