Functional Activity of HIV-1 bNAbs Across Diverse Strains is Driven by Binding Site and Can be Enhanced Through Fc Engineering
Li, C. J.; Lim, E.; Phelps, M.; Brady, J. M.; Okonkwo, V.; McCarthy, C.; Alexander, C.; Ackerman, M. E.; Lingwood, D.; Balazs, A. B.
Show abstract
Broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) are promising tools for HIV-1 treatment and prevention, due to their ability to mediate both Fab-dependent neutralization and Fc-dependent effector functions. While antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) have been implicated in antiviral activity, the extent to which these functions vary across bNAb epitopes, viral strains, and Fc region remains unclear. Here, we systematically evaluated twenty bNAbs targeting five distinct Env epitopes against a diverse panel of nine HIV-1 strains. We found that epitope specificity and Env sequence both critically influenced bNAb effector functions. CD4 binding site (CD4bs)- and V3 glycan-targeting bNAbs mediated the broadest and most potent ADCC and ADCP, while V1/V2 apex-directed bNAbs preferentially induced ADCP. In contrast, MPER-targeting bNAbs triggered ADCC more selectively, and gp120/gp41 interface-targeting bNAbs showed limited activity. Irrespective of binding epitope, different strains exhibited a broad range of effector function sensitivities. To investigate the impact of Fc modifications on this variability, we subclass-switched and introduced previously identified Fc mutations known to change Fc{gamma} receptor affinity. Some of these mutations significantly boosted ADCC, while IgG3 subclass switching dramatically enhanced ADCP, even against highly resistant strains. Collectively, these results demonstrate that effector function is shaped by both antibody specificity and viral Env context and that rational Fc modification has the potential to improve antibody-based therapeutics against HIV. One Sentence SummaryThis study systematically evaluates the impact of bNAb epitope specificity, Env sequence, and Fc engineering on antibody-mediated effector functions.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Delineating the functional activity of antibodies with cross-reactivity to SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV-1 and related sarbecoviruses 97%
- A single, improbable B cell receptor mutation confers potent neutralization against cytomegalovirus 97%
- Non-neutralizing antibodies targeting the immunogenic regions of HIV-1 envelope reduce mucosal infection and virus burden in humanized mice 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Broadly Neutralizing Macaque Monoclonal Antibody Against the HIV-1 V3-Glycan Patch 97%
- A Remarkable Genetic Shift in a Transmitted/Founder Virus Broadens Antibody Responses Against HIV-1 96%
- Functional characterization and lineage analysis of broadly neutralizing human antibodies against dengue virus identified by single B cell transcriptomics 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Antibody-mediated prevention of vaginal HIV transmission is dictated by IgG subclass in humanized mice 96%
- A human antibody reveals a conserved site on beta-coronavirus spike proteins and confers protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection 96%
- Antigen-agnostic identification of poxvirus broadly neutralizing antibodies targeting OPG153 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Conversion of monoclonal IgG to dimeric and secretory IgA restores neutralizing ability and prevents infection of Omicron lineages 96%
- Omicron mutations enhance infectivity and reduce antibody neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 virus-like particles 95%
- Structural insights of a highly potent pan-neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 human monoclonal antibody 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Recapitulation of HIV-1 Env-Antibody Coevolution in Macaques Leading to Neutralization Breadth 97%
- Antibodies with potent and broad neutralizing activity against antigenically diverse and highly transmissible SARS-CoV-2 variants 96%
- Broadly neutralizing antibodies target the coronavirus fusion peptide 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.