Low-Dimensional and Optimised Representations of High-Level Information in the Expert Brain
Costantino, A. I.; Platonov, A.; Fontana Vieira, F.; Van Hove, E.; Bilalic, M.; Op de Beeck, H.
Show abstract
What transforms a novice into an expert? While decades of research show that expertise relies on domain-specific knowledge, a neural account of this transformation has remained fragmentary. We lack an understanding of what information expert representations encode, how they are structured for efficient use, and where in the brain they reside. Here, using chess as a model system for outstanding performance, we combine neuroimaging with multivariate pattern analysis to reveal three principles of the expert brain. We show that expertise drives a shift in representational content, from surface visual features to high-level, relational information. This is accompanied by a structural change, to low-dimensional, optimised representation. Neural codes become more compact and better organised for rapid use, yet retain the details needed for precise evaluation. Finally, we find the representational load shifts from sensory-specific cortices to domain-general frontoparietal networks. These principles show how the expert brain packs more into less, concentrating richer knowledge into fewer, better-organised representations that support rapid, flexible decision-making that defines mastery.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The representational hierarchy in human and artificial visual systems in the presence of object-scene regularities 96%
- The lexical categorization model: A computational model of left-ventral occipito-temporal cortex activation in visual word recognition 96%
- Task-evoked activity quenches neural correlations and variability across cortical areas 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.