Back

A streamlined nanopore-compatible 5PSeq protocol for rapid phenotypic antimicrobial sensitivity testing

Liu, H.; Huch, S.; Hull, R.; Romero Garcia, F.; Nersisyan, L.; Yin, X.; Chen, W.-H.; Chen, J.; Pelechano, V.

2025-11-12 microbiology
10.1101/2025.11.12.687992 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a significant threat to public health. Rapid and accurate antimicrobial sensitivity testing is essential to guide effective treatment. Here, we present "simplified 5PSeq" (s5PSeq), a streamlined protocol for profiling 5 monophosphorylated (5P) mRNA degradation intermediates that reflect ribosome dynamics in vivo. By capturing antibiotic-induced, context-specific ribosome stalling events, s5PSeq provides a molecular proxy for bacterial growth inhibition--offering a molecular phenotypic readout without the need for culturing. s5PSeq reduces library preparation time to under four hours and incorporates a novel rRNA blocking strategy. We demonstrated its clinical utility by identifying erythromycin-resistant and sensitive Clostridioides difficile clinical isolates. Combining s5PSeq with real-time nanopore sequencing enables fast AMR diagnosis with as few as 3000 reads. In addition to simplifying the study of 5P co-translational mRNA decay, our work suggests that utilizing information-rich phenotypic molecular readouts can significantly improve AMR diagnostics. HighlightsO_LIs5PSeq is a streamlined protocol for profiling 5P mRNA degradation intermediates. C_LIO_LIContext-specific ribosome stalls can be used to assess phenotypic antimicrobial sensitivity at the molecular level. C_LIO_LIBlocking rRNA sequencing at the ligation step streamlines library preparation and lowers costs and hands-on time. C_LIO_LIIntegration with nanopore sequencing allows same-day antimicrobial sensitivity testing in species with 5-3 exonuclease. C_LI

Published in Cell Reports Methods (predicted rank #21) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.