Back

Multi-step implementation of meiotic crossover patterning

Cavka, I.; Woglar, A.; Wu, Y.-L.; Durmus, E. B.; Sloat, L.; Gros, A.; Pineiro Lopez, C.; Hecht, F.; Villeneuve, A. M.; Ries, J.; Koehler, S.

2025-11-13 cell biology
10.1101/2025.11.12.687980 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Crossover formation during meiosis is a tightly controlled process in which genetic information is exchanged between homologous chromosomes to increase the diversity of the progeny. In this process, an excess of double-strand breaks is introduced, but only a limited subset is ultimately processed into crossovers. Imbalances in the distribution of crossovers can lead to errors in chromosome segregation, with devastating consequences on the health of the progeny. However, the selection of which breaks are designated to become crossovers is still poorly understood, as both its timing and the ultimate molecular mechanisms are under debate. Here, we used 3D dual-color single-molecule localization microscopy and real-time confocal imaging, combined with advanced image analysis, to investigate the timing and mechanism of crossover designation in C. elegans. We show that meiotic crossover patterning is not established by a single decision point but depends on a dynamic, multi-layered regulation process. An initial, early selection process restricts potential crossovers to a small subset of double-strand break sites that already exhibit basic patterning features, including assurance and interference. A second, later step fine-tunes this pattern to ultimately ensure genome integrity and promote accurate chromosome segregation. Real-time imaging reveals that although the full process takes more than seven hours, key molecular events occur within minutes, high-lighting how rapid local dynamic changes can give rise to an overall slow but extremely robust crossover regulation program.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.