Back

Supervised cardiorespiratory training decreases post-stroke fatigue and improves cardiorespiratory fitness - a RCT

Brandal, A.; Svedjebrant, M.; Nilsagard, Y.; Wester, P.

2025-11-24 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2025.11.12.25340123 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionPost-stroke fatigue (PSF) affects nearly half of all stroke survivors and significantly hinders rehabilitation and daily functioning. There is no established treatment. Low cardiorespiratory fitness may contribute to PSF, suggesting aerobic training as a potential intervention. MethodsIn this two-center, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial, we evaluated a home-based supervised cardiorespiratory interval training program (HS-CITP) in individuals with PSF (Swedish Fatigue Assessment Scale [S-FAS] [&ge;]28) 1-7 months post-stroke. Participants were randomized (1:1) to either HS-CITP or usual care with self-directed activity following early supported discharge. The intervention included three weekly cycling sessions at 70%-80% of maximum heart rate over eight weeks. The primary outcome was self-reported fatigue (S-FAS); the secondary outcome was peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak, mL/kg/min) post-intervention. ResultsForty-five participants were randomized; 43 completed follow-up (HS-CITP: n=22; control: n=21). Adherence to HS-CITP was 92%, with no adverse events. Compared with the control group, HS-CITP significantly reduced fatigue (mean between-group difference -5.35 S-FAS points; 95% CI -9.03 to -3.67; p<.001) and improved cardiorespiratory fitness (+4.48 VO2peak mL/kg/min; 95% CI 3.41-5.54; p<.001). ConclusionSupervised home-based interval training significantly reduced PSF and improved fitness, with high adherence and no safety concerns. These findings support integrating structured aerobic exercise into stroke rehabilitation. Larger, longer-term trials are needed to confirm the durability of this benefit. RegistrationURL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03458884

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.