Back

Supervised cardiorespiratory training decreases post-stroke fatigue and improves cardiorespiratory fitness - a RCT

Brandal, A.; Svedjebrant, M.; Nilsagard, Y.; Wester, P.

2025-11-24 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2025.11.12.25340123 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionPost-stroke fatigue (PSF) affects nearly half of all stroke survivors and significantly hinders rehabilitation and daily functioning. There is no established treatment. Low cardiorespiratory fitness may contribute to PSF, suggesting aerobic training as a potential intervention. MethodsIn this two-center, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial, we evaluated a home-based supervised cardiorespiratory interval training program (HS-CITP) in individuals with PSF (Swedish Fatigue Assessment Scale [S-FAS] [&ge;]28) 1-7 months post-stroke. Participants were randomized (1:1) to either HS-CITP or usual care with self-directed activity following early supported discharge. The intervention included three weekly cycling sessions at 70%-80% of maximum heart rate over eight weeks. The primary outcome was self-reported fatigue (S-FAS); the secondary outcome was peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak, mL/kg/min) post-intervention. ResultsForty-five participants were randomized; 43 completed follow-up (HS-CITP: n=22; control: n=21). Adherence to HS-CITP was 92%, with no adverse events. Compared with the control group, HS-CITP significantly reduced fatigue (mean between-group difference -5.35 S-FAS points; 95% CI -9.03 to -3.67; p<.001) and improved cardiorespiratory fitness (+4.48 VO2peak mL/kg/min; 95% CI 3.41-5.54; p<.001). ConclusionSupervised home-based interval training significantly reduced PSF and improved fitness, with high adherence and no safety concerns. These findings support integrating structured aerobic exercise into stroke rehabilitation. Larger, longer-term trials are needed to confirm the durability of this benefit. RegistrationURL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03458884

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.0%
2
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
3
Stroke
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.9%
4
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.8%
5
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Trials
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.5%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.5%
8
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.4%
9
Disability and Rehabilitation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
10
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
11
Neurology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
12
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
13
BMC Neurology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
14
Healthcare
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
15
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
17
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
18
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
20
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Thorax
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
ERJ Open Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
23
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%