Back

Matrix Stiffness Dictates Doxorubicin-Induced Apoptosis by Modulating Cell-Cycle State in HeLa Cells

Calahan, N.; Burlingham, S.; Prasad, A.; Ghosh, S.

2025-11-13 biophysics
10.1101/2025.11.11.687886 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Drug resistance remains a major challenge in cancer treatment by contributing to recurrence and metastasis. Fractional killing, in which only a subset of cells undergo apoptosis after drug exposure, is a key contributor to this resistance and is influenced by genetic and nongenetic heterogeneity within the tumor microenvironment. Solid tumors display substantial variation in extracellular matrix stiffness, providing evidence that the mechanical context of cancer and stromal cells may play an important role in therapeutic response. Here, we investigated how substrate stiffness affects the dynamics of apoptosis and the mechanisms behind differences in the cell death response to doxorubicin (DOX). HeLa cells cultured on stiffer substrates exhibited enhanced caspase-3/7 activation and increased apoptotic cell death, whereas cells on soft substrates showed markedly reduced apoptotic signaling and improved survival. Although substrate stiffness altered cytoskeletal organization, pharmacological disruption of actin polymerization or actomyosin contractility did not influence nuclear DOX accumulation, indicating that cytoskeletal mechanics were not the primary factor in the stiffness-dependent sensitivity. Instead, flow cytometry revealed that substrate stiffness modulates cell-cycle distribution, with soft substrates enriched in the G1 population and a reduced fraction of cells in the DOX-sensitive S phase. Synchronizing cells at the G1/S phase boundary eliminated stiffness-dependent differences in apoptotic activation, demonstrating that cell-cycle state is a dominant driver of stiffness-mediated fractional killing. These findings highlight a mechanistic link between extracellular matrix mechanics and chemotherapeutic response by suggesting that microenvironment-regulated cell-cycle dynamics contribute to drug resistance in mechanically heterogeneous tumors.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
10.1%
3
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
5
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.9%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
10
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 19%
2.6%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.6%
12
Integrative Biology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
13
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
15
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
16
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
18
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
19
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
21
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
22
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
23
Cell Death Discovery
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
26
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%