Back

Unveiling early visual cortical mechanisms in perceptual filling-in: a parametric study of eccentricity and movement dependence

Koiso, K.; Razafindrahaba, A.; van de Ven, V.; De Martino, F.; Roberts, M. J.; De Weerd, P.

2025-11-12 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.11.11.687787 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Surface perception relies on interactions between boundary encoding and surface filling-in. In a perceptual filling-in paradigm, a blank figure becomes perceptually replaced by a textured background after prolonged fixation of a point away from the figure. Filling-in begins when neurons representing the figures boundary adapt, allowing background-related activity to spread into the figures retinotopic representation. Adaptation proceeds faster the better the boundary is stabilized in a neurons receptive field (RF). We hypothesized that moving the figure boundary beyond a neurons RF would reduce adaptation and hinder filling-in, with larger movements permitting progressively less filling-in. As RF size increases with eccentricity, we further hypothesized that greater eccentricities would require larger movements to interfere with filling-in. Our results confirmed both predictions. The reduction in filling-in duration with increasing motion range permitted estimating RF size at each eccentricity. The slope of a linear function relating RF size to eccentricity matched values reported in human fMRI studies of V1/V2, suggesting that boundary adaptation involves early visual areas. We also explored whether microsaccade amplitude affects filling-in, but found no supporting evidence. Thus, external figure motion and microsaccades may disrupt adaptation through different mechanisms. These findings provide new insights into neural adaptation processes preceding perceptual filling-in.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.