Back

High-efficiency targeted integration of extrachromosomal arrays in C. elegans using PhiC31 integrase

Rich, M. S.; Pellow, R.; Hefel, A.; Rog, O.; Jorgensen, E. M.

2026-01-21 genetics
10.1101/2025.11.11.687718 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Extrachromosomal arrays are unique chromosome-like structures created from DNA injected into the C. elegans germline. Arrays are easy to create and allow for high expression of multiple transgenes. They are, however, unstable unless integrated into a chromosome. Current methods for integration, such as X-rays and CRISPR, damage DNA and are low-efficiency. Here, we demonstrate that the viral integrase PhiC31, which mediates a non-mutagenic recombination between short attB and attP sequences, can be used for extremely efficient and targeted integration of arrays. In this method, a transgene, a selectable marker, and attP sites are injected into the gonad of a strain that (1) has an attB site in its genome, and (2) expresses PhiC31 in its germline. F1 extrachromosomal arrays are cloned, grown for multiple generations with selection, and then screened for homozygous array integrations. The procedure is simple, requires less time than screening for extrachromosomal arrays, and arrays can be screened for transgene function after stable integration. Arrays that transmit are integrated by PhiC31 with 50-95% efficiency, allowing for the isolation of many unique integrants from a single injection. Arrays can also be integrated at fluorescent landing pads and arbitrary sites in the genome. Using nanopore sequencing, we show that three new integrated arrays are between 1.6 and 18 megabases in length, assemble with large repeats, and can contain hundreds of copies of injected transgenes. We have built a collection of strains and plasmids to enable array integration at multiple sites in the genome using various selections. PhiC1-mediated Integration of Arrays of Transgenes (PhiAT) will allow C. elegans researchers to shift from using unstable extrachromosomal arrays to directly integrating arrays.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
14.2%
2
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.2%
3
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.3%
4
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.7%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.8%
6
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
STAR Protocols
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.3%
10
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
11
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Nature Protocols
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Journal of Neurogenetics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.5%
15
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
The CRISPR Journal
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
18
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
19
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
20
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Current Protocols
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
22
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.9%
24
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
27
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
28
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
29
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
30
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%